No More Worries!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Our Guarantees


  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing


WISEWOMAN (located under Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention)
Summary: Briefly summarize the public health program, community, and stakeholders that you identified in Milestone One.

 Stages of Development: At what stage of development has the public health issue progressed to within the community? Discuss briefly.

 Evaluation Standards: Answer these questions for your evaluation, using the CDC Framework evaluation standards:

o Specificity: What is the purpose of the evaluation?

o Utility: Who is the evaluation for?

o Feasibility: What are the time and resources available to do the evaluation?

 Evaluation Questions: Specify 3–5 evaluation questions that will be the focus of your program evaluation plan.

 Challenges: Identify and discuss the challenges that you are likely to encounter in this evaluation and how you might overcome these in the following


o Prioritizing stakeholder needs.

o Stage of development of the program.

Sample Solution

“It is critical to be clear as to exactly why the internationally diversified portfolio opportunity set is of lower expected risk than comparable domestic portfolios. The gains arise directly from the introduction of additional securities and/or portfolios which are of less than perfect correlation with the securities and portfolios within the domestic opportunity set” (IPTD, no date). It is important to understand a few decades ago it was stated that cross border correlation was low (Grubel, 1968), yet the speed of change in globalisation through information technology and a more connected world, has resulted in more positively correlated stockmarkets between the developed nations. “The level of correlation between the UK and US market is now so high that the usefulness of independent analysis of the larger-cap UK market indices must now be moot” (Eckett, 2013). Campbell and Ammer (1993) find that news about future excess returns is the dominating force behind movements in US stock returns, with news about future dividends and real interest rates being less important. Raddant (2016) noted that following Brexit, the four largest markets were positively correlated. There are more opportunities for negative correlation in developing European countries which serve local rather than global markets. Masuduzzaman (2012), argues that there are short and long term relationships between the UK and Germany markets. Cook (2013) notes the close correlation in the main indices could be explained by medium to large companies being more globally focused and having to rely on international markets. Opportunities for diversification could therefore lie amongst European smaller companies. Typically, this will serve local markets and should therefore not be influenced by political and economic events cross border. The article also highlights that the US, being a larger expanse of land and cultures can shrug of the need to rely on foreign revenues.

Price Calculator

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Total Cost:

12% Discount


  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us


  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments