3213HSL: Individual Assignment- Written Assignment

Order Description CRITERIA PERFORMANCE Unsatisfactory - 1 Satisfactory - 2 Good - 3 Very Good - 4 Excellent - 5 Shared goals & leadership – willin" rel="nofollow">ing to work together and motivate others to achieve group outcomes. /20 Almost no account of the value of cooperation in" rel="nofollow">in workin" rel="nofollow">ing toward shared goals or group outcomes 1-4 marks Recognised the value of workin" rel="nofollow">ing toward shared goals. Communication was described as less than cooperative 5-8 marks Described in" rel="nofollow">in detail the value of shared goals and outcomes related to workin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in a cooperative manner 9-12 marks Described and analysed the value of workin" rel="nofollow">ing toward shared goals in" rel="nofollow">in a highly cooperative manner 13-16 marks Provided high level of reflection upon the value of workin" rel="nofollow">ing toward shared goals and outcomes in" rel="nofollow">in a very cooperative manner 17-20 marks Active listenin" rel="nofollow">ing, empathy, trust and sensitivity to others – bein" rel="nofollow">ing aware and understandin" rel="nofollow">ing of the differences in" rel="nofollow">in group dynamics, considers others ideas and reliance on others. /20 Ignored the practice of listenin" rel="nofollow">ing. Did not reflect upon respondin" rel="nofollow">ing appropriately to others’ ideas. Interactions with others showed little sensitivity to differin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal (and cultural) nuances. 1-4 marks Identified some active listenin" rel="nofollow">ing and respondin" rel="nofollow">ing skills. Interaction with others with some sensitivity to differin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal (and cultural) nuances. 5-8 marks Emphasised active listenin" rel="nofollow">ing and respondin" rel="nofollow">ing skills. Interaction with others with sensitivity to differin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal (and cultural) nuances. 9-12 marks Highlighted Interactions with others with deep sensitivity to differin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal (and cultural) nuances. 13-16 marks High level of reflection upon in" rel="nofollow">interactions with others with deep sensitivity to differin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal (and cultural) nuances. 17-20 marks Communication & problem solvin" rel="nofollow">ing – bein" rel="nofollow">ing assertive, participatin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in constructive problem solvin" rel="nofollow">ing and completin" rel="nofollow">ing assigned tasks. /20 Little evidence of participation in" rel="nofollow">in group, little description of communication style in" rel="nofollow">in the group in" rel="nofollow">interaction for problem solvin" rel="nofollow">ing, and lack of recognition of bein" rel="nofollow">ing fair and ethical with others. 1-4 marks Some description of participation in" rel="nofollow">in group, limited accounts of communication style in" rel="nofollow">in group in" rel="nofollow">interaction for problem solvin" rel="nofollow">ing that demonstrates a fair and ethical manner. 5-8 marks Well described account of group participation and communication style in" rel="nofollow">in in" rel="nofollow">interaction for problem solvin" rel="nofollow">ing, in" rel="nofollow">includin" rel="nofollow">ing communicatin" rel="nofollow">ing with others in" rel="nofollow">in a fair and ethical manner. 9-12 marks Detailed reflection upon group participation and in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal communication styles and skills for problem solvin" rel="nofollow">ing, with very good account of fair and ethical in" rel="nofollow">interactions. 13-16 marks Exceedin" rel="nofollow">ingly good reflection upon the value of group participation and in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal communication for problem solvin" rel="nofollow">ing, sound account of fair and ethical in" rel="nofollow">interactions with others. 17-20 marks Appreciative Inquiry– Able to reflect upon own in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal communication skills and analyse by applyin" rel="nofollow">ing concepts /40 Very descriptive account of in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal communication and no concepts used. 0-8 marks Relevant examples provided that demonstrate some understandin" rel="nofollow">ing of in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal communication, but few concepts cited or explored. 9-16 marks Well described examples of in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal communication that demonstrates in" rel="nofollow">insight through the application of key concepts from the literature. Moves beyond description of in" rel="nofollow">interaction. 17-24 marks Detailed examples that are well chosen and well analysed with respect to key concepts in" rel="nofollow">in the literature. Deeper analysis of experiences developed. 25-32 marks Nuanced description and analysis of in" rel="nofollow">interpersonal communication examples. Ability to critically analyse own in" rel="nofollow">interactions by usin" rel="nofollow">ing key concepts. Offers deeper in" rel="nofollow">insight in" rel="nofollow">into the value of concepts and reflection. 33-40 marks Learnin" rel="nofollow">ing Goal: 1. Develop graduates with effective communication skills for diverse busin" rel="nofollow">iness environments Learnin" rel="nofollow">ing Objective: 1.1 Demonstrate effective Interpersonal Communication Skills