Full Answer Section

Cons:

• The paternalistic model can be disempowering for patients, as they are not given a say in the decision-making process.
• The paternalistic model can lead to patient dissatisfaction, as patients may feel that their wishes are not being respected.

Informative model

In the informative model, the healthcare provider provides the patient with all of the relevant information about the decision, and the patient makes the decision themselves.

Pros:

• The informative model respects the patient’s autonomy, as the patient is given the opportunity to make their own decision.
• The informative model can lead to patient satisfaction, as patients feel that they have been involved in the decision-making process.

Cons:

• The informative model can be time-consuming, as the provider has to provide the patient with a lot of information.
• The informative model can be ineffective in cases where the patient is not able to understand the information or make a decision.

Shared decision making

In the shared decision making model, the healthcare provider and the patient work together to make the decision. The provider provides the patient with information, and the patient shares their values and preferences. The provider and the patient then work together to reach a decision that is acceptable to both of them.

Pros:

• The shared decision making model is respectful of the patient’s autonomy, as the patient is involved in the decision-making process.
• The shared decision making model can lead to patient satisfaction, as patients feel that they have been involved in the decision-making process and that their wishes have been respected.
• The shared decision making model can be effective in cases where the patient is able to understand the information and make a decision.

Cons:

• The shared decision making model can be time-consuming, as the provider has to provide the patient with a lot of information and the patient has to share their values and preferences.
• The shared decision making model can be difficult to implement in some settings, such as in emergency situations.

Which method has the strongest possibility of resulting in permanent change?

The shared decision making model has the strongest possibility of resulting in permanent change. This is because the patient is involved in the decision-making process and their values and preferences are taken into account. This makes the patient more likely to be committed to the decision and to make changes that are sustainable over time.

However, it is important to note that all three models can be effective in different situations. The best model to use will depend on the individual patient and the specific decision that needs to be made.