To answer all these 3 questions below and do not exceed 1 and 1/2 pages.
Q1: Pls. explain two ESG strategies an investor may apply in the investment process. The two ESG strategies you select
should be considered sufficient to constitute a reference to sustainability according to the Asset Management Association
Switzerland (AMAS).*
Q2: Please compare the pros and cons of the two ESG strategies you have selected. The comparison should be based on your own critical reflection and
selected literature.
Q3: Which one of the two strategies would you consider to be more effective as a climate strategy in the investment
process («climate-alignment of a portfolio»)? Please outline the assumptions and reasoning of your assessment.
- For further information please see the AMAS self regulation («Self-regulation on transparency and disclosure for sustainability-related collective assets»)
available here: https://www.am-switzerland.ch/en/regulierung/selbstregulierung-standard/sustainable-finance
Sample Solution