Please critique the quality of the letter below answering the questions below. Answer in complete sentences, no use of first person, and other aspects of the MUGS document. Using track changes in WORD, make corrections and provide feedback within the sample letter. Type the feedback related to a specific item directly below the question (below the questions you copied/pasted at the bottom of the sample in which you provided feedback). Feedback needs to be in track changes and a copy of the questions below, answered, at the bottom of the letter. Must explain questions with “details” please.
Was the writer’s approach appropriate? Describe.
Was the request clearly written and easy to understand? Explain.
How did the argument/information support the requested amount?
How clear was the flow and organization of the letter?
Did the facts and assumptions make sense? Explain.
Did the facts and assumptions make sense? Explain.
Did the writer support the facts adequately? Explain.
How could the letter have been approved? Describe and use track changes
Sample Solution