Auto ethnography
Conduct a study similar to those conducted by Sondra Perl
and Alcir Santos Neto, but instead of looking at someone else, you will examine yourself and
your own writing processes and write an autoethnography in which you describe them. Your
method will be to record (preferably with video and audio) your complete writing process as you
complete a writing assignment for a class. Your purpose is to try to learn some things about your
actual writing practices that you might not be aware of and to reflect on what you learn using the
terms and concepts you’ve read about in this part of the class.
Determining Your Object of Study and Collecting Data
To make this assignment as useful as possible, you need to plan ahead, so figure out what
you will be writing for this or other classes in the next few weeks, and make a decision about
what you will study. Consider the following:
What kinds of assignments are easiest or most difficult for you to write?
What kinds of assignments would be the most useful to examine yourself writing?
Before beginning your project, make sure that you know how to use your computer or other
device’s audio and/or video recording programs.
As you write the assignment that you will study, record yourself every time that you work
on it – this includes even times when you are thinking and planning for it, or when you are
revising. Keep the following in mind:
You may not be near your recording device(s) when you are planning; if that is the case,
then keep a log in which you note your thoughts about the assignment.
2
When you sit down to type the paper, think out loud the entire time. This will feel
strange, and it will take some effort. Do your best.
Try to externalize everything you are thinking. If you have trouble knowing what to say,
go back to Perl and look at the kinds of things that Tony said aloud when he was being
studied.
When you have completely finished writing the assignment whose writing process you’re
studying, listen to or view the recording of yourself and transcribe it. This means typing
everything that you said on the tape, even the “ums” and “ahs.” It will be helpful to double space
(or even triple space) the transcript so that you can make notes on it, if you plan to do so by
hand. You might also find Track Changes or its equivalent useful for note-taking as you
transcribe.
Analyzing Your Data
With some classmates, come up with a code to help you study your transcript. To see
how to make a code, return to Neto or Perl for their descriptions of how they came up with their
codes. To consider what categories or elements of writing process you might want to include in
your code, look back through the readings you’ve done in this part of the class. What did the
various authors choose to study about people’s writing processes? Some suggestions for things
you might include would be notes about context (where and when you wrote, what distractions
you faced, your attitude, any deadlines, etc.), codes for planning, brainstorming, large-scale
revision, small-scale revision, pausing, and so on.
What you want is a code that will help you understand what’s happening when you write.
Beware of the following potential pitfalls:
3
If the code is too vague, you won’t learn anything at all.
If the code is too detailed (for example, if you try to do what Perl did and record the exact
amount of time you took for each action), you might never get done coding.
We recommend coming up with a code with the rest of your class, and then trying to use that
code on a practice transcript that your teacher provides. This will help you see if the code is
useful.
Once you have settled on a code, use it to analyze your transcript:
You might get a box of highlighters of different colors, and use each color to highlight
the parts of the text that correspond to parts of the code (for example, pink is for
planning).
You could simply underline parts of the transcript and label them in shorthand (P =
planning).
If you used a computer, you could search for key phrases in the text and mark each
occurrence by using the software’s “reviewing” feature to insert a comment in the
margin.
You could use free or low-cost coding and data analysis software such as Dedoose to
upload your transcript and label different parts of it with codes you input, which allows
you to generate helpful visualizations of how your various codes interact with the data.
Once you have coded the transcript, go back and consider these questions:
What is interesting about what you found? What immediately jumps out at you?
Did you do some things a lot, and other things rarely or never? Which codes do you see
frequently or little at all?
How does your analysis suggest you compare with Tony?
4
Like some of the authors in this part of the class, you might make some charts or tables for
yourself in order to visually explore what percentage of time you spent on various activities.
Planning and Drafting
What are you going to write about? You don’t need to go into excruciating detail about
everything you coded. Instead, you should decide what you want to claim about what you found.
For example:
How would you describe your writing process?
What are the most important take-home points from your analysis?
Are there aspects of your process that are definitively impacted by technologies like
instant messaging, social networking, Skype, or even word-processing?
Based on the patterns that emerge from your analysis of data, decide what your claims will be
and then return to your analysis to select data that give evidence of those claims.
By now, from discussions in class and with your teacher you should have a sense of what
genre you’ll write your report in, and in deciding that, you should know your audience, purpose,
and exigence as well. Will you write about your findings in an informal reflective essay in which
you discuss your process and compare yourself to some of the writers in this class, or write a
more formal, researched argument like Perl or Neto did, using an intro/background/methods/
analysis/discussion structure? Or will you write in some other genre?
You’ll definitely want to plan your genre before you begin drafting, since your drafting
process will vary by genre. If you are writing the reflective essay, you are most likely writing for
yourself (writing to learn) and to share what you learn with fellow student writers and your
teacher, for the purpose of improving your writing processes and abilities. Such reflection is
5
often best “drafted toward” by knowing the main claims you want to make and striking out on
your writing, understanding that you’ll be discovering and learning along the way and will
probably revise extensively in order to reach a consistent message from beginning to ending of
your piece.
If you will be writing a more scholarly research article, you might begin by outlining the
various sections of your paper: In your introduction, what other research will you cite? Whose
work provides important background information for your study? What is the gap or niche that
your study fills? How will you describe your research methods? What are the main claims you
want to make in the findings? One trick that some writers use is to write headings for each
section, with main claims underneath. Then the writer can go back and write one section at a
time in order to break up the writing.
Once you have a “shitty first draft,” revise it to make it a little more coherent. Then share
it with classmates, being sure to tell them what genre you wrote and what concerns or issues
you’d like them to read for.
What Makes It Good?
The purpose of this assignment was for you to try to learn some things about your actual
writing practices that you might not have been aware of, and to reflect on what you learned using
the terms and concepts you’ve read about in this part of the class. Does your paper demonstrate
that this purpose was achieved? In addition, your readers will want to learn something from
having read your paper. Does your finished text clearly convey your insights and findings?
A caveat: We have found that some students just go through the motions when they
complete this assignment, but don’t make an attempt to learn something about themselves as
6
writers. When those students write their papers, they have very little to say about “results” or
“insights.” They tend to say pretty clichéd things like “I am distracted when I write. I should try
to write with fewer distractions.” In general, if the “insights” of the paper were obvious to you
before you ever conducted the autoethnography, then you have not fully engaged in the project
and are unlikely to receive a good grade on it.
Alternative Assignment
Instead of studying yourself writing one assignment, compare yourself writing two very
different kinds of texts (maybe in school and out of school, or humanities and science) and
analyze them to see whether – or how – your process changes depending on what you’re writing.