BigP (LittleP)

  Paper details A code base (BigP) of 50,000 LOC is typically much more than 10x as expensive to develop than a code base (LittleP) of 5,000 LOC in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in spite of only bein" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing 10x the size. Write an essay (in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in under 500 words), which has two parts: first give a rough estimate of the difference in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in cost between the BigP and LittleP assumin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing a standard rate of defects per lin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ine of code (see McConnell 27.3, table 27.1): you should at least come up with a multiplier (e.g., BigP costs 17x the cost of LittleP) second, provide an argument, in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in terms of your estimate, about the how a modular architecture might reduce the cost of BigP toward merely 10x the cost of LittleP. You are allowed to be optimistic in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in your assumptions. important # the first part (do you give a plausible estimate of the cost differential), # the second part (is your argument coherent and reasonable). must be under 500 words PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)