Blackburn v Attorney-General

Blackburn v Attorney-General [1971] 1 WLR 1037 Order Description Public Law Case Note Template STUDENT ID: Case name: Law Reports Citation: Level of Court: Judgment Date: Judge(s) who heard the Case: Procedural History (has the case been heard in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in a lower court? If so what was the fin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing and why?): Summary of the facts leadin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing up to the case bein" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing brought (very brief): Decision in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in the case: Ratio/ Legal reason(s) for the decision (this is the most important section): What legal prin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inciple(s) does the case illustrate? Case Commentary: (please refer directly to evidence from the case to support your commentary) Bibliography: (in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">include on a separate sheet if preferred but ensure you upload with this casenote as one document). Instructions: This is based on the uk public law. OSCOLA REFRENCING For your casenote & commentary coursework assessment on the case above, you will be expected to draw upon your knowledge of research, casenotin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing, citin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing and referencin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing and both descriptive and analyticalwritin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing developed in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in LSP. An annotated bibliography of the sources you have used is also required. Please follow the template for the casenote on p27 of the Public Law handbook. For your casenote, we are expectin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing you to work alone (no collaboration please) Usin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing your LSP skills, search for this case and type up a casenote on it. For your casenote commentary, we are expectin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing you to work alone (no collaboration please) Usin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing your LSP skills, search for at least five different sources relative to the case in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in question (refer to p18 of your LSP handbook for a list of possible sources to search, but at least one of your choices must be a primary source). Usin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing your LSP skills, search for one legislative lin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ink relative to the case in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in question. Use all of your sources to provide a discussion/argument on one or more aspects relative to the case in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in question. You will be demonstratin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing your technical skills in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in casenotin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing and also your understandin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing of the case itself and its wider remit in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in the Commentary by explain" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing why one or more aspects are of particular in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">interest relative to the case in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in question. Provide an annotated bibliography of all the sources you cite.