Bolter and Gromala arguement about “digital art"

The following post has two assingments namely;

1.Bolter and Gromala arguement about “digital art"

Bolter and Gromala (2005, p.7) argue “digital art can be the purest form of experimental design” Critically discuss this statement using one of the three examples of digital artists or digital art projects

2.Hobbes state of nature

[2] what is Rousseau's argument (in so many words) agains or Locke's State of Nature? OR 131 There's a tension in Hobbes between "15“ and."°“92Ee} 23236“ orients his political thinking toward man-as-he-IS hat "the ycgu man-as-he-ought-to-be. Plato and Aristotle taught t at “the ifwf. are ruled by their passions, but did not rule out tha t5 tgifu Still Ought to try to be ruled by reason. Hobbes rejec ,L J, n inequality: none of us are ruled by reason, all of US bYfiwaSlo by fear of violent death above all. Reason is only, now avd then, the servant of our passions. Now, we "convenant" with ourselves, out of fear Of VlOleNt death, to give up our right to determine the means of our self- preservation, and we transfer this right over to the sovereign. But once this is done, How the sovereign rules is up to the sovereign. Question: Is Hobbes the realist entitled to offer a standard of reasonable rule, of how the sovereign OUGHT to rule? Can we say that the FACT that the sovereign rules comes to the same as the RIGHT to rule? If we rebelled against the sovereign, what would make it unjustified? That our rebellion failed? What would justify it? That it succeeded? And even if it would be foolish, would it be "unjust" if the sovereign decided not to pursue civil peace?