Bombardiere v. Schlumberger

  1. What issue did the court determine regarding Dr. Lipsey's qualifications?
  2. How many different versions of Dr. Lipsey's expert CV were mentioned in the case?
  3. Explain the Court's reasoning behind the statement, " An expert's qualification depends on 'the nature of the opinion he offers.' "
  4. Do you believe that Dr. Lipsey's behavior breached an ethical obligation of an expert witness and if so, what should the consequence of the breach be?

Sample Solution