Business Ethics

Order Description 1. Can Matt Zwolin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inski’s “choice” argument in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in defense of sweatshops be used to justify child labor? Why/why not? 2. What, if anythin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing, does Milton Friedman’s theory of corporate social responsibility imply about the ethics of advertisin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing to vulnerable consumers? Would he disagree with George Brenkert’s view on this matter? Why/why not? 3. Consider the followin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing scenario: Loop: A trolley is runnin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing out of control down a track. In its path are five people who have been tied to the track by a mad philosopher. Fortunately, you can flip a switch, which will lead the trolley down a different track. Unfortunately, there is a very large man tied to this track, and beyond the very large man, this track loops back onto the main" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in lin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ine towards the five. Accordin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ingly, if it were not for the presence of the very large man, who will stop the trolley, flippin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing the switch would not save the five. Should you flip the switch? Why/why not? What, if anythin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing, distin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inguishes the “loop” case from the origin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inal case of the “runaway train" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in” or the case of the “very large man?” (Pictures on the next page) 4. Why does Andrew Walton believe that consumers are not morally required to purchase Fair Trade goods? Does the logic of his argument entail that consumers are not morally required to purchase environmentally-friendly products as well? 5. Should defenders of the stakeholder theory of the modern corporation condemn sweatshops? Why/why not? 6. What, if anythin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing, does Norman Bowie’s theory about the moral responsibility that busin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inesses have towards the environment imply about Mylan’s decision to raise the price of the EpiPen? Would he condemn it as an immoral act of “price gougin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing?” Why/why not? 7. What, if anythin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing, do the three domin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inant views of justice in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in pay (the agreement view, the desert view, and the utility view) imply about the gender wage gap? Only use the sources I upload as well as the class notes