No More Worries!

Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

Double or single-spaced
1-inch margin
12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
300 words per page

No Lateness!

Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

AEW Guarantees

Free Unlimited revisions
Guaranteed Privacy
Money Return guarantee
Plagiarism Free Writing

Business Finance - Management An Ethical Quandary

In last week's activity, you described how public health managers can effectively promote an "ethics-focused" organizational culture. Even though an ethics-based culture may exist, applying ethics standards to scenarios presented in public health agencies is still necessary. Leaders need to have a framework for analyzing issues to arrive at ethically informed decisions. In this assignment, you will apply an analytical framework to justify a position on an ethics-related topic.

Preparation
Identify an ethical issue related to public healthcare that interests you. Examples are nearly endless. Three examples are:
The ethics of providing individuals needles for drug use.
Releasing a vaccine in an emergency pandemic without completing the usual time-intensive testing and research.
Making vaccines mandatory in times of pandemic.
Review EXHIBIT 11.3 Framework for Analysis of Ethical Issues in Public Health found in chapter 11 of your textbook. You will use this framework to analyze the issue and arrive at a position regarding it.
Instructions
Identify your chosen issue and analyze it using the framework for Analysis of Ethical Issues in Public Health found in your textbook. Do the following in 3-4 pages:

Analyze the ethical issue by answering at least 4 of the probing questions found in the framework.
Briefly evaluate the ethical dimensions of TWO distinct options for resolving the dilemma against the following:
Utility.
Justice.
Respect for individual interests.
Respect for legitimate public institutions.
State and justify your chosen position on the issue by evaluating it against the following principles:
Effectiveness.
Proportionality.
Necessity.
Least infringement.
Requirements
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

Analyze ethical issues faced by public health leaders.

Sample Answer

Ethical Analysis of Mandatory Vaccination in a Pandemic: Public Health Framework Application

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed an unprecedented challenge for public health leadership: balancing the duty to protect the community’s health against the imperative to respect individual liberty and bodily autonomy. This paper analyzes the highly contentious ethical issue of implementing mandatory vaccination policies during a pandemic. Using a simulated framework based on typical criteria for ethical analysis in public health, this discussion will explore the competing values, evaluate distinct policy options, and ultimately justify a conditional position on mandatory vaccination against core public health principles.

The central ethical tension inherent in this issue pits the "Police Power" of the state—the authority to restrict individual rights to protect the public good—against the fundamental principle of Respect for Persons, which dictates that individuals maintain control over their medical decisions (Kass, 2001).

Section 1: Analysis of the Ethical Issue (Probing Questions)

The following analysis applies at least four probing questions derived from a standard public health ethics framework to fully explore the dimensions of mandatory vaccination.

1. What are the public health goals and scientific basis for the proposed intervention?

The primary public health goals of mandatory vaccination are twofold:

Achieve Herd Immunity/Elimination: To reach a high vaccination rate necessary to break the chain of transmission, thereby protecting both the vaccinated and the vulnerable who cannot be vaccinated (e.g., due to medical contraindications or age).