China and Northeast Asia in the early 21st century

Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina and Northeast Asia in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in the early 21st century 1. Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s relations with Japan: economics hot but politics cold 2. Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s relations with North Korea: a buffer state? 3. Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s relations with Russia: an axis of convenience? Basic readin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing: • Samuel S. Kim (ed), The International Relations of Northeast Asia (Lanham, ML: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004), Chapters 1, 2, 9, and 11. • Grasso, Corrin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in and Kort, Modernization and Revolution in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina, Chapter 12. Additional readin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ings: • Peter Hays Gries et al., ‘Historical beliefs and the perception of threat in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Northeast Asia: colonialism, the tributary system, and the Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina-Japan-Korea relations in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in the twenty-first century,’ International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 9, no. 2 (May 2009): 245-65. • International Crisis Group, Shades of Red: Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s Debate over North Korea. Asia Report No. 179 (Brussels: International Crisis Group, 2009), http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/asia/north-east-asia/north-korea/179_shades_of_red___chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inas_debate_over_north_korea.ashx. • International Crisis Group, Fire on the City Gate: Why Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina Keeps North Korea Close. Asia Report No. 254 (Brussels: International Crisis Group, 2013), http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/asia/north-east-asia/chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina/254-fire-on-the-city-gate-why-chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina-keeps-north-korea-close.aspx. • International Crisis Group, Dangerous Waters: Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina-Japan Relations on the Rocks. Asia Report No. 245 (Brussels: International Crisis Group, 2013), http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/asia/north-east-asia/chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina/245-dangerous-waters-chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina-japan-relations-on-the-rocks.aspx • International Crisis Group, Old Scores and the New Grudges: Evolvin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing Sin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ino-Japanese Tensions. Asia Report No. 258 (Brussels: International Crisis Group, 2014), http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/asia/north-east-asia/chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina/258-old-scores-and-new-grudges-evolvin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing-sin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ino-japanese-tensions.aspx. • International Crisis Group, North Korea: Beyond the Six-Party Talks. Asia Report No. 269 (Brussels: International Crisis Group, 2015), http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/asia/north-east-asia/north-korea/269-north-korea-beyond-the-six-party-talks.aspx. • Samuel S. Kim, The Two Koreas and the Great Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), Chapter 2. • Bobo Lo, Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing, and the New Geopolitics (London: Chatham House, 2008). • Gregory J. Moore, “How North Korea threatens Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">interests: understandin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inese ‘duplicity’ on the North Korean nuclear issue,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 8, no. 1 (January 2008): 1-29. • David Shambaugh (ed), Power Shift: Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina and Asia’s New Dynamics (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005), Chapters 5, 6 and 10. • Susan L. Shirk, Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina: Fragile Superpower (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), Chapter 6. • Mark J. Valencia, ‘The East Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina Sea disputes: history, status, and ways forward,’ Asian Perspective 38, no. 2 (April-June 2014): 183-218. • Jeanne L. Wilson, ‘The Eurasian economic union and Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s silk road: implications for the Russian-Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inese relationship,’ European Politics and Society 17, no. S1: 113-132. • Michael Yahuda, Sin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ino-Japanese Relations After the Cold War: Two Tigers Sharin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing a Mountain" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in (Abin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ingdon: Routledge, 2014), Chapter 6. • 1. Power transition theory 2. Is Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina a revisionist or a status-quo power? 3. Is a peaceful rise of Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina possible in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in light of US strategic rebalance to Asia? Basic readin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ings: • Barry Buzan, “Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">international society: is ‘peaceful rise’ possible?” Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inese Journal of International Politics 3, no. 1 (Sprin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing 2010): 5-36. • Alastair Iain" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Johnson, ‘Is Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina a status quo power?’ International Security 27, no. 4 (Sprin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing 2003): 5-56. • John J. Mearsheimer, ‘Can Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina rise peacefully?’ The National Interest, 25 October 2014, http://nationalin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">interest.org/commentary/can-chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina-rise-peacefully-10204. • Xiaotin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing Li, ‘Applyin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing offensive realism to the rise of Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina: structural in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">incentives and Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inese diplomacy toward the neighborin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing states,’ International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 16, no. 2 (2016): 241-271. • Yves-Heng Lim, ‘How (dis)satisfied is Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina? A power transition theory perspective,’ Journal of Contemporary Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina 24, no. 92 (2015): 280-297. • LIU Min" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ingfu, The Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina Dream: Great Power Thin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inkin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing and Strategic Posture in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in the Post-American Era (New York: CN Times Books, 2015), Chapters 1-4. • Morton and Lewis, Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina: Its History and Culture, Chapter 17. • Ely Ratner, ‘The American strategic rebalance and an in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">insecure Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina,’ The Washin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ington Quarterly 36, no. 2 (2013): 21-38. • Robert S. Ross and ZHU Feng (eds), Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s Ascent: Power, Security, and the Future of International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008), Chapters 2 and 12. • Shambaugh (ed), Power Shift, Chapters 1 and 16. • ‘Special issue: Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inese foreign policy on trial: contendin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing perspectives?’ International Affairs 92, no. 4 (July 2016). • Arthur Waldron, ‘Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s “peaceful rise” enters turbulence,’ Orbis 58, no. 2 (2014): 164-181. • Wang, Harmony and War, Chapter 7. • Womack (ed.), Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s Rise in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Historical Perspective, Chapters 2 and 4. • Xiaomin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing Zhang, ‘A risin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina and the normative changes in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">international society,’ East Asia: An International Quarterly 28, no. 3 (September 2011): 235-46. • Yongjin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in Zhang, “‘Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina anxiety’: discourse and in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">intellectual challenge,” Development and Change 44, no. 6 (November 2013): 1407-25. • Suisheng Zhao, ‘Rethin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inkin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing the Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inese world order: the imperial cycle and the rise of Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina,’ Journal of Contemporary Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina 24, no. 96 (November 2015): 961-982. • ZHENG Bijian, ‘Chin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ina’s “peaceful rise” to great-power status,’ Foreign Affairs 84, no. 5 (October 2005): 18-24.