There are a number of topics within climate change that you may choose as your focus of research. For
example, you may choose to focus on the relationship between (i) food production and climate change; (ii)
government policy and climate change; (iii) water shortage and climate change; (iv) race and climate
change; and so on.
The goal of this essay is to develop an insightful scholarly perspective by consulting published research that
names and attempts to solve a relevant ethical problem. Remember, an argument does not replicate an
existing perspective but attempts to invent a new idea that responds more effectively to relevant ethical
problems. Your “invention,” in this assignment, is naming, describing, and evaluating competing cultural
logic.
Using the resources collected in your annotated bibliography, your task in this assignment is to:
(1) Identify two competing cultural logics within the collected research;
(2) Determine the dominant trope that places each cultural logic in competition;
(3) Explain where the competing logics agree, using the analysis to support your claims;
(4) Explain where the competing logics disagree, using the analysis to support your claims.
Once you have established these claims, you will:
(5) Evaluate which cultural logic is more persuasive, using the analysis to support your claims.
Sample Solution