Clinical Project

Assessment Item: Practice Development Clin" rel="nofollow">inical Project (50%) Word Length: No more than 2500 words You must choose a topic related to your off campus clin" rel="nofollow">inical experience (My placement was at the Operatin" rel="nofollow">ing Theatre department in" rel="nofollow">in a big Sydney tertiary hospital which contain" rel="nofollow">ined 18 in" rel="nofollow">individual theatres in" rel="nofollow">in total). I worked along side with Anaesthetic nurses, Scrub/scout nurses and recovery nurses for various types of surgical cases. Your topic chosen must discuss each of the followin" rel="nofollow">ing 5 poin" rel="nofollow">ints and critically analyse the topic usin" rel="nofollow">ing evidence-based literature within" rel="nofollow">in the last 10 years: o A description of the topic presentation (Topic chosen: Accurately complete patients’ pre-op checklists before takin" rel="nofollow">ing patients in" rel="nofollow">into their operatin" rel="nofollow">ing theatres – Anaesthetic nurse) and its clin" rel="nofollow">inical consequences (This poin" rel="nofollow">int can be written in" rel="nofollow">in first person) o Biopsychosocial consequences that may arise in" rel="nofollow">in the clin" rel="nofollow">inical topic in" rel="nofollow">includin" rel="nofollow">ing the impact/s it may have on the patient and their family o Discuss the therapeutic relationship between nurses and patients/families in" rel="nofollow">in the context of care related to the topic o Discuss the cultural issues that may be associated with the topic o Depict the ethical legal and policy issues that may arise durin" rel="nofollow">ing the process of care for your specific topic. Markin" rel="nofollow">ing criteria: Unsatisfactory Satisfactory More than satisfactory Outstandin" rel="nofollow">ing Identifies the case/topic and in" rel="nofollow">introduces the clin" rel="nofollow">inical consequences The case/topic is vaguely discussed or not identified. Min" rel="nofollow">inimal foundational knowledge evident and clin" rel="nofollow">inical consequences in" rel="nofollow">inadequately described. The case/topic is identified and discussed however, there is no, or min" rel="nofollow">inimal explanation of the clin" rel="nofollow">inical context/ consequences. Min" rel="nofollow">inimal foundational knowledge evident. The case/ topic is identified and explain" rel="nofollow">ined. The magnitude of the issue is identified and clin" rel="nofollow">inical consequences are well lin" rel="nofollow">inked to the case. The case/topic is outlin" rel="nofollow">ined with a clear orientation to the clin" rel="nofollow">inical consequences of the specific case. Foundational knowledge of the case is evident and focus on the significance of specific consequences is well established. Clearly articulates the biospychosocial aspects of care (e.g. relational, psychological, physical) related to the case/topic and the impact of the illness of the patient and their family Does not articulate the many aspects of care in" rel="nofollow">in relation to the case/ topic and poorly describes the impact of illness on the patient and family. Describes in" rel="nofollow">in min" rel="nofollow">inimal detail the aspects of care in" rel="nofollow">in relation to the case/ topic and briefly describes the impact of illness/ condition on the patient and family. Adequately describes the aspects of care that are grounded within" rel="nofollow">in the context of the case/ topic. Good analysis of the impact of the illness/ condition on the patient and the family. Describes in" rel="nofollow">in detail the aspects of care that are grounded within" rel="nofollow">in the context of the case/ topic. Analyses in" rel="nofollow">in depth the impact of the illness on the patient and the family. Discusses the importance of the therapeutic nurse- patient relationship within" rel="nofollow">in the context of care Description of the therapeutic Nurse- patient relationship is min" rel="nofollow">inimal or absent and/ or not related to the case/ topic. Description of the nurse- patient therapeutic relationship is based on an analysis of limited contemporary evidence. Some lin" rel="nofollow">inkage to the case/ topic. Presents a credible description of the therapeutic nurse- patient relationship which is rationalised and related to the case/topic. Uses contemporary evidence to demonstrably support discussion. Presents a thorough description and analysis of the importance of the therapeutic nurse- patient relationship as related to the case/topic. This is supported by in" rel="nofollow">in-depth and critical engagement with high quality evidence. Effectively discusses the cultural issues in" rel="nofollow">in the context of care related to the case/ topic Poorly identified and discussed cultural issues related to the case/ topic. Unconnected ideas. Logical structure. Cultural issues identified and briefly discussed but lackin" rel="nofollow">ing depth and relation to case/ topic Presents a well-developed discussion in" rel="nofollow">in relation to cultural issues. Clearly identifies and lin" rel="nofollow">inks them to the case/ topic. Presents an outstandin" rel="nofollow">ing discussion with regard to cultural issues. Clearly identifies and lin" rel="nofollow">inks them to the case/ topic. Depicts the ethical, legal and policy issues that may arise durin" rel="nofollow">ing the process of case/ topic Description of the ethical, legal and policy issues related to the case/ topic are poorly identified and in" rel="nofollow">inadequately discussed Some description of the ethical, legal and policy issues related to the process of care but these are not well lin" rel="nofollow">inked to the case/ topic Well described ethical, legal and policy issues related to the process of care. Issues are well lin" rel="nofollow">inked to the case/ topic Excellent discussion of the ethical, legal and policy issues related to the process of care in" rel="nofollow">in the specific case/ topic Accurate use of widespread, current referencin" rel="nofollow">ing to enhance understandin" rel="nofollow">ing of the topic area Min" rel="nofollow">inimal evidence to support the argument; poor quality use of available resources and in" rel="nofollow">inadequate referencin" rel="nofollow">ing Some evidence to support argument but not well read and researched. Referencin" rel="nofollow">ing satisfactory Widespread evidence to support argument with adequate referencin" rel="nofollow">ing Use of references in" rel="nofollow">incorporated are relevant and of high quality providin" rel="nofollow">ing specific in" rel="nofollow">information on the case/ topic Widespread evidence to support argument Use of references in" rel="nofollow">incorporated within" rel="nofollow">in the portfolio are relevant and of outstandin" rel="nofollow">ing quality providin" rel="nofollow">ing specific in" rel="nofollow">information on the case/ topic. Additional Comments Maker Name…………