Using Rogerian argument
topic is on the use of Narcan and how it used to save the lives of people that OD on opioids, and if communities should be using tax payer dollars to save addicts that OD multiple times. I have seen this story on Vice News and with the growing epidemic in the US and on social media questioning if it is worth saving the life of an addict that OD's multiple times.
My position is that communities should use Narcan to saves lives even if the person is still going continue to use opioids. Apposing view would be if addicts continue to use it was their choice just let them die.
Sample Solution