Community Development Assay

ensure you read the assessment brief very well and address the question well. Also ensure strictly 100% plagerism free. 10 reference sources and 1500 word limit assay. please send it well before due date so i can review. thanks clear evidence-based practice (EBP) question usin" rel="nofollow">ing the PICO format is the first step in" rel="nofollow">in developin" rel="nofollow">ing a change in" rel="nofollow">in practice. In this Discussion, you will explore the steps in" rel="nofollow">involved in" rel="nofollow">in EBP and develop a researchable EBP question in" rel="nofollow">in the PICO format that addresses a patient quality and safety issue. In this Discussion you will identify three clin" rel="nofollow">inical practice problems in" rel="nofollow">in your current (or past) practice as a nurse that risk compromise to quality of care and patient safety. You will select one of these problems to clearly defin" rel="nofollow">ine the risk and ask a question usin" rel="nofollow">ing the PICO format. Askin" rel="nofollow">ing the question and selectin" rel="nofollow">ing the problem is the first step of the Impact Model that is discussed in" rel="nofollow">in the textbook. Evidence-based practice questions are asked and written in" rel="nofollow">in the PICO format and you will use this process as you develop an evidence-based practice project that will be completed in" rel="nofollow">in steps durin" rel="nofollow">ing the course. Note Initial Post: A three-paragraph (at least 250–350 words) response. Be sure to use evidence from the readin" rel="nofollow">ings and in" rel="nofollow">include in" rel="nofollow">in-text citations. Utilize essay-level writin" rel="nofollow">ing practice and skills, in" rel="nofollow">includin" rel="nofollow">ing the use of transitional material and organizational frames. Avoid quotes; paraphrase to in" rel="nofollow">incorporate evidence in" rel="nofollow">into your own writin" rel="nofollow">ing. A reference list is required. Use the most current evidence (usually = 5-years-old.) SOC103A - AB2, Report Page 1 Assessment Brief Program Bachelor of Applied Social Science Subject Developin" rel="nofollow">ing Social Policy Subject code SOC 103A Name of assessment Assessment 2: Report on Policy Process Length 1500 words Learnin" rel="nofollow">ing outcomes addressed by this assessment: a) Describe and discuss the nature of social policy and the theoretical underpin" rel="nofollow">innin" rel="nofollow">ing of social policy development b) Identify the elements and stages of policy development and the policy process d) Describe the relationships of government agencies and public advocacy groups in" rel="nofollow">in the development of social policy Submission Date: Week 7 Assessment brief summary: Report on the process of formulation and implementation of social policies. Total marks 100 marks Weightin" rel="nofollow">ing 30% Students are advised that any submissions past the due date in" rel="nofollow">incur a 10% penalty per day, calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 40 will in" rel="nofollow">incur a 4 mark penalty per day. Please note: you must attempt all tasks in" rel="nofollow">in a subject to be eligible to pass the subject. More in" rel="nofollow">information, please refer to the Academic Progression Policy on http://www.thin" rel="nofollow">ink.edu.au/about-thin" rel="nofollow">ink/thin" rel="nofollow">ink-quality/our-policies. SOC103A - AB2, Report Page 2 Assessment Description: Research and write a report on a policy that has been implemented in" rel="nofollow">in a workplace of your choice. Utilizin" rel="nofollow">ing your knowledge of the policy process and stages of policy formulation and implementation, critically discuss how the policy was formulated and implemented within" rel="nofollow">in the workplace. You should pay particular attention to issues of empowerment and participation, and to practical considerations such as timeframe, fundin" rel="nofollow">ing, research, allocation of resources, and arrangements made for evaluation of the policy etc. Students will need to in" rel="nofollow">interview senior staff at the workplace to fin" rel="nofollow">ind out how and why the policy came in" rel="nofollow">into bein" rel="nofollow">ing, how it was implemented, within" rel="nofollow">in what timeframe, what challenges were encountered, the empowerment effects of the policy, and what how regularly and effectively the policy is evaluated. A ground-level staff at the workplace should also be in" rel="nofollow">interviewed to fin" rel="nofollow">ind out their views about the policy and how it’s workin" rel="nofollow">ing. Markin" rel="nofollow">ing Criteria: Max. in" rel="nofollow">in category Your poin" rel="nofollow">ints Word count, readability, and structure 10/100 In-text references and reference list, accuracy and use of correct referencin" rel="nofollow">ing style 10/100 Clear and well-structured discussion of the key stages of the policy process 40/100 Critical assessment of the policy process in" rel="nofollow">includin" rel="nofollow">ing issues of empowerment, participation and evaluation 40/100 Total: 100/100 Percentage Mark: /30% Comments: SOC103A - AB2, Report Page 3 Notes for assignments This assignment will in" rel="nofollow">incorporate a formal in" rel="nofollow">introduction, main" rel="nofollow">in poin" rel="nofollow">ints and conclusion; The work must be fully referenced with in" rel="nofollow">in-text citations and a reference list at the end. We recommend you work with your Academic Writin" rel="nofollow">ing Guide to ensure that you reference correctly. You will fin" rel="nofollow">ind a lin" rel="nofollow">ink to this document on the main" rel="nofollow">in page of every unit, under the 'Assessments' section. Correct academic writin" rel="nofollow">ing and referencin" rel="nofollow">ing are essential tasks that you need to learn. We recommend a min" rel="nofollow">inimum of ten references, unless in" rel="nofollow">instructed differently by your lecturer/tutor. Unless specifically in" rel="nofollow">instructed otherwise by your lecturer, any paper with less than ten references may be failed. Work that in" rel="nofollow">includes sources that are not properly referenced accordin" rel="nofollow">ing to the HWF Academic Writin" rel="nofollow">ing Guide 2013 will not meet level 100 requirements and will be penalized. Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count – as a general rule you may go over or under by 10% than the stated length. The assessment MUST be submitted electronically in" rel="nofollow">in Microsoft Word format. Other formats may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in" rel="nofollow">in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in" rel="nofollow">in Word. Notes for referencin" rel="nofollow">ing: High quality work must be fully referenced with in" rel="nofollow">in-text citations and a reference list at the end. We recommend you work with your Academic Writin" rel="nofollow">ing Guide to ensure that you reference correctly. You will fin" rel="nofollow">ind a lin" rel="nofollow">ink to this document on the main" rel="nofollow">in page of every unit, under the 'Assessments' section. Correct academic writin" rel="nofollow">ing and referencin" rel="nofollow">ing are essential tasks that you need to learn. References are assessed for their quality. You should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. Your textbook can be used as a reference, but not the Study Guide and lecturer notes. We want to see evidence that you are capable of conductin" rel="nofollow">ing your own research. Also, in" rel="nofollow">in order to help markers determin" rel="nofollow">ine students’ understandin" rel="nofollow">ing of the work they cite, all in" rel="nofollow">in-text references (not just direct quotes) must in" rel="nofollow">include the specific page number/s if shown in" rel="nofollow">in the origin" rel="nofollow">inal. Before preparin" rel="nofollow">ing your assignment or own contribution, please review this YouTube video by clickin" rel="nofollow">ing on the followin" rel="nofollow">ing lin" rel="nofollow">ink: Plagiarism: How to avoid it You can search for peer-reviewed journal articles, which you can fin" rel="nofollow">ind in" rel="nofollow">in the onlin" rel="nofollow">ine journal databases and which can be accessed from the library homepage. Wikipedia, onlin" rel="nofollow">ine dictionaries and onlin" rel="nofollow">ine SOC103A - AB2, Report Page 4 encyclopedias are acceptable as a startin" rel="nofollow">ing poin" rel="nofollow">int to gain" rel="nofollow">in knowledge about a topic, but should not be overused – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources. Additional in" rel="nofollow">information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research in" rel="nofollow">institutes such as the NHMRC, or in" rel="nofollow">international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The content of the followin" rel="nofollow">ing lin" rel="nofollow">ink explain" rel="nofollow">ins why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites: Why can't I just Google? (thanks to La Trobe University for this video).