Community is the ‘killer app’ missing from virtual reality

Explanation of the evidence: This analogy is powerful because it helps readers to understand the scale and scope of the harm that has been done to Black Americans. It also makes clear that reparations are not just about compensating Black Americans for the individual wrongs they have suffered, but also about addressing the systemic racism that has been embedded in American society since its founding.

Explanation of the effects if Coates rhetorical move on his readers: Coates' use of analogy is effective because it makes his argument more concrete and relatable to readers. It also helps to create a sense of urgency, as it suggests that the problem of racism is so deep-seated that it requires a radical solution like reparations.

Conclusion: Coates' use of analogy is just one example of the many rhetorical devices that he uses to persuade readers that reparations are necessary. His article is a powerful and persuasive argument for racial justice, and it is essential reading for anyone who wants to understand the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow in the United States.

Topic sentence: In his article, "The Case for Reparations," Ta-Nehisi Coates uses a variety of rhetorical devices to persuade readers that reparations are necessary to address the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow in the United States.

Textual evidence: One of the most striking rhetorical devices that Coates uses is analogy. He compares the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow to a "racialized house of cards," arguing that the entire American economy is built on a foundation of white supremacy and Black exploitation. Coates writes:

"The case for reparations is that we have a racialized house of cards, and that the entire structure is built on the unpaid debt of Black labor and Black suffering."