Compare neoclassical with classical, Marxian OR post-Keynesian price/ value theory. How do they differ? Which do you think gives the most satisfactory vision, and why?

Compare neoclassical with classical, Marxian OR post-Keynesian price/ value theory. How do they differ? Which do you thin" rel="nofollow">ink gives the most satisfactory vision, and why? Order Description These are some sources, please be consistent with citation. Was told that citation is separate word count but in" rel="nofollow">included for free so 1650 words of content please Required: M.C. Howard and J.E. Kin" rel="nofollow">ing (1985) ‘The theory of value’, from The Political Economy of Marx, 2ed. (New York: New York University Press), pp. 91-107. Yanis Varoufakis (1998) ‘Textbooks on consumer and choice theory’, from Foundations of Economics: a begin" rel="nofollow">inner’s companion (London: Routledge), pp. 43-75 * Lavoie 2, pp. 25-32. (Download: opac.library.usyd.edu.au/ record=b3784374~S4) * Duncan Foley (2008) ‘The long-period method and Marx’s theory of value’, https://havenscenter.org/files/foley.marx.lp.method.pdf P. Garegnani (1984) ‘Value and distribution in" rel="nofollow">in the classical economists and Marx’, Oxford Economic Papers, 36:2, pp. 291-325. Isaak Rubin" rel="nofollow">in (1972) Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value, esp. Chapters 2, 8, 17-18, https://www.marxists.org/archive/rubin" rel="nofollow">in/value/ Paul Sweezy (1968) ‘The transformation of values in" rel="nofollow">into prices’, in" rel="nofollow">in The Theory of Capitalist Development (New York: Monthly Review Press), pp. 109-32. Frank Stilwell (2012) ‘Free-market economics’ and ‘Consumers’, in" rel="nofollow">in Political Economy: the contest of economic ideas, 3 ed. (Melbourne: Oxford University Press), pp. 150-70. Hal Varian’s Intermediate Microeconomics: a modern approach, 9 ed. (New York: W.W. Norton & Co.). Marc Lavoie (2014) ‘Theory of choice’, from Post-Keynesian Economics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 72-122.