compression devices

Order Description done some of the work like i put the first steps of the article and the excel sheet and how i would it to be done but you can change any thin" rel="nofollow">ing but in" rel="nofollow">in the boarder of the scenario as well as you can rewrite the article and reorganise the criteria in" rel="nofollow">in the excel sheet or delete some of them or even add a new criteria i'll upload a file that has every thin" rel="nofollow">ing with 2 example of an old assignment about different devices. the article should be about 500 word. the references should be VancouverReference so you will be doiong one article 500 words and 2 excel sheet on of them comparison between 4 devices or more that test troponin" rel="nofollow">in and the other one is a comparison between 4 devices or more that test creatin" rel="nofollow">inin" rel="nofollow">ine. i will upload the references of the devices and if you could to fin" rel="nofollow">ind more devices that would be great but make the 2 test equal that mean if compare between 4 devices for troponin" rel="nofollow">in then make a comparison between 4 devices for creatin" rel="nofollow">inin" rel="nofollow">ine. thanks a lot Assignment Your references should be formatted accordin" rel="nofollow">ing to the Vancouver convention. Insert a footer with the page x of y format and name the file with your last name and the assignment number e.g. Green assignment one. You will also fin" rel="nofollow">ind associated with each assignment a markin" rel="nofollow">ing rubric in" rel="nofollow">in Gradebook which will be used when markin" rel="nofollow">ing your submissions. Use it as a guide when preparin" rel="nofollow">ing your assignments to ensure that you have addressed all of the criteria that will contribute to your assessment. Poin" rel="nofollow">int of Care Patient Testin" rel="nofollow">ing (POCT) Assignment - Introduction of a new POCT device Scenario: In order to improve patient access and throughput, a management review of the requirements for a busy emergency department at a regional hospital has established the need to provide POCT for troponin" rel="nofollow">in and creatin" rel="nofollow">inin" rel="nofollow">ine. You have been asked by your manager to provide recommendations for the selection of appropriate POCT devices for these tests. Your Assignment: Provide justification for your choice of devices. To do this you will need to develop a selection criteria to compare the available devices. Then you will need to summarise your recommendations and consider any on-goin" rel="nofollow">ing operational procedures required in" rel="nofollow">in order to provide quality results for patient testin" rel="nofollow">ing. Include in" rel="nofollow">in your answer recommendations with regard to: • Critical evaluation of testin" rel="nofollow">ing devices which provide results appropriate to clin" rel="nofollow">inical requirements (i.e. is the chosen device fit for purpose ?) • Pre-analytical considerations o Instructions for patient preparation and sample collection o Patient safety and risk management o Operator handlin" rel="nofollow">ing & train" rel="nofollow">inin" rel="nofollow">ing required • Analytical considerations o Frequency and type of quality control (QC) o External quality assessment (EQA) procedures o Device main" rel="nofollow">intenance requirements • Post-analytical o Instructions for the recordin" rel="nofollow">ing / reportin" rel="nofollow">ing of results • Other general considerations for testin" rel="nofollow">ing Some background notes about this assignment: For the successful completion of this exercise, you will need to thin" rel="nofollow">ink about all the aspects of testin" rel="nofollow">ing for these analytes. This will in" rel="nofollow">include all of the quality specifications as well as the practical considerations such as user friendlin" rel="nofollow">iness, cost, shelf-life of reagents, portability and so forth. (Note: This is what you would need to do in" rel="nofollow">in a work environment if you were asked to select a new in" rel="nofollow">instrument – be it lab or POCT). To do this you would first collate the data and in" rel="nofollow">include it in" rel="nofollow">in a spreadsheet for comparison. Then once your comparison and decision is made, you would write a brief report for your manager. Such a report is called an executive summary. These summaries are only one page in" rel="nofollow">in length – this is because your manager is busy and just wants your conclusions with brief justifications. Structure: Your details: Your executive summary and Excel sheet must have your name, student number, & date as a footer to the document. Justification = Excel spread sheet: Develop two spreadsheets (one for each analyte) to be presented in" rel="nofollow">in the one workbook (plus embedded as tables in" rel="nofollow">in the word document). Each of these spreadsheets should critically compare devices again" rel="nofollow">inst your selection criteria. Recommendations = Written (executive) summary: Provide a written summary justifyin" rel="nofollow">ing your recommendations. As this is an executive summary, your word document should be no more than two page of writin" rel="nofollow">ing with a word limit of 500 for the written text. Referencin" rel="nofollow">ing: (Vancouver style). Place your relevant references at the bottom of your Excel sheet and just add the main" rel="nofollow">in references based on your decision to the word document.