Computer science
Parnas describes several of his concerns for SDI project from a software eng
ineer
ing perspective. Identify those aspects of his position which you feel would apply
generally to work on large, safety-critical software projects. Relate those concerns to professional ethical standards if possible. Address the follow
ing questions
Parnas addresses:
1-What are the fundamental technological differences between software eng
ineer
ing and other areas of eng
ineer
ing; i.e., why is software unreliable?
2-What properties of the proposed SDI software that make it unatta
inable?
3-Why are the follow
ing areas of research not go
ing to solve these problems: software eng
ineer
ing, artificial
intelligence, automatic programm
ing, and program
verification?
4-Why is military fund
ing of research
in software (and comput
ing science, generally)
inefficient and
ineffective?
2:Communications
Short Read
ing Response #4: Brennan Williams and Gazelle Emami, “How To Make It As A Black Sitcom: Be Careful How You Talk About Race”
L
ink to read
ing: https://www.huff
ingtonpost.com/2014/10/21/black-sitcom-black-ish_n_6002850.html (L
inks to an external site.)L
inks to an external site.
Write a response to the prompt below that is no more than 250 words
in length.
PROMPT
“Smart comedy does not end with ‘mak
ing fun’ of groups. Good comedy capably permits all of its subjects to turn
inward, thereby expos
ing their shortcom
ings, strengths,
and eccentricities” – Rob
in R. Means Coleman
In “How to Make It as a Black Sitcom,” Coleman and others (cited
in the article) describe what they see as the problem of approach
ing issues of race (and class)
in
black situational comedies, which
in this article refers to a sitcom that stars a predom
inately all-black ensemble. Accord
ing to this article, what makes a black
situational comedy “successful” (rat
ings-wise) when it comes to its treatment of race or lack thereof? In addition, what is the source of racial comedy
in most black
situational comedies and why does the article f
ind that k
ind of comedy to be a problem? Lastly, briefly
interpret Coleman’s statement (above) about “smart comedy.” If
possible, can you th
ink of a sitcom that you th
ink is “smart?”