Construction

Construction Order Description Choose one of these projects: a) The 2012 London Olympics b) London Heathrow Termin" rel="nofollow">inal 5 (startin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in 1986) c) CrossRail d) Three Gorges Dam (Peoples Republic of Chin" rel="nofollow">ina) Then: 1. Review recent academic literature relatin" rel="nofollow">ing to stakeholder theory and its application to the engagement with and management of stakeholders in" rel="nofollow">in large projects and programmes. This should end with a summary of the main" rel="nofollow">in poin" rel="nofollow">ints you have found. This is worth 30% of the paper. 2) Review the stakeholder management performance of your chosen large project/programme by applyin" rel="nofollow">ing the fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings from your literature review. Your consideration should in" rel="nofollow">include (but not limited to) the followin" rel="nofollow">ing:- a. The successful (or otherwise) communication of ‘vision’ b. A table mappin" rel="nofollow">ing/classifyin" rel="nofollow">ing the stakeholders in" rel="nofollow">in the project (for the avoidance of doubt this table will NOT be in" rel="nofollow">included in" rel="nofollow">in the Word Count) c. Different (or otherwise) levels of success in" rel="nofollow">in managin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">internal and external stakeholders d. The degree to which stakeholder issues in" rel="nofollow">increased project/programme complexity and the effect of this on the wider project performance to date (for in" rel="nofollow">instance, any published estimation of effects on schedule and cost) This is worth 40% of the paper. 3) Draw conclusions from your analysis regardin" rel="nofollow">ing the chosen project/programme performance in" rel="nofollow">in managin" rel="nofollow">ing its stakeholders notin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in particular the extent to which your conclusions show agreement or disagreement with the fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings from your literature review This part is worth 20% 4) Fin" rel="nofollow">inally the Presentation – although this is not a professional report, you should aim at a professional standard of presentation. There is no need for an abstract or executive summary but there should be an in" rel="nofollow">index. You should also pay close attention to the structure of your paper and the in" rel="nofollow">indication of that given by headin" rel="nofollow">ings and sub-headin" rel="nofollow">ings. You should also pay attention to the layout of your paper, division of the text in" rel="nofollow">into paragraphs of appropriate length, labelin" rel="nofollow">ing of tables and graphs. Text should be sin" rel="nofollow">ingle-spaced and you should avoid the use of scanned images. 5) Referencin" rel="nofollow">ing- I will read and go over everythin" rel="nofollow">ing you have written ANYTHING you take from an article or whatever source you are takin" rel="nofollow">ing it from, reference it in" rel="nofollow">in text and at the end of the paper. This is really important I need to go back and check where you got your facts from.