Criminal Profiling

request this paper via bestessay, my professor reviewed and suggested some changes. Below is the feedback. Rubric Detail A rubric lists gradin" rel="nofollow">ing criteria that in" rel="nofollow">instructors use to evaluate student work. Your in" rel="nofollow">instructor lin" rel="nofollow">inked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Content Name: Crimin" rel="nofollow">inal Profile Rubric Exit Grid View List View Show Descriptions Show Feedback Main" rel="nofollow">in Elements0 (22%) Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 0 (23%) - 0 (25%) Includes almost all of the main" rel="nofollow">in elements and requirements and cites multiple examples to illustrate each element. Proficient 0 (20%) - 0 (22%) Includes most of the main" rel="nofollow">in elements and requirements and cites many examples to illustrate each element. Needs Improvement 0 (18%) - 0 (19%) Includes some of the main" rel="nofollow">in elements and requirements. Not Evident 0 (0%) - 0 (17%) Does not in" rel="nofollow">include any of the main" rel="nofollow">in elements and requirements. Feedback: See the feedback that I have provided throughout your work. Go back to the rubric and ensure that all sections have been covered. Inquiry and Analysis0 (17%) Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 0 (18%) - 0 (20%) Explores multiple issues through extensive collection and in" rel="nofollow">in-depth analysis of evidence to make in" rel="nofollow">informed conclusions. Proficient 0 (16%) - 0 (17%) Explores some issues through collection and in" rel="nofollow">in-depth analysis of evidence to make in" rel="nofollow">informed conclusions. Needs Improvement 0 (14%) - 0 (15%) Explores min" rel="nofollow">inimal issues through collection and analysis of evidence to make in" rel="nofollow">informed conclusions. Not Evident 0 (0%) - 0 (13%) Does not explore issues through collection and analysis of evidence and does not make in" rel="nofollow">informed conclusions. Feedback: There are some areas that I have marked where your analysis needs to be a bit more concrete and less opin" rel="nofollow">inionated. Integration & Application0 (10%) Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 0 (9%) - 0 (10%) All of the course concepts are correctly applied Proficient 0 (8%) - 0 (8%) Most of the course concepts are correctly applied Needs Improvement 0 (7%) - 0 (7%) Some of the course concepts are correctly applied Not Evident 0 (0%) - 0 (6%) Does not correctly apply any of the course concepts Critical Thin" rel="nofollow">inkin" rel="nofollow">ing0 (17%) Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 0 (18%) - 0 (20%) Demonstrates comprehensive exploration of issues and ideas before acceptin" rel="nofollow">ing or formin" rel="nofollow">ing an opin" rel="nofollow">inion or conclusion Proficient 0 (16%) - 0 (17%) Demonstrates moderate exploration of issues and ideas before acceptin" rel="nofollow">ing or formin" rel="nofollow">ing an opin" rel="nofollow">inion or conclusion Needs Improvement 0 (14%) - 0 (15%) Demonstrates min" rel="nofollow">inimal exploration of issues and ideas before acceptin" rel="nofollow">ing or formin" rel="nofollow">ing an opin" rel="nofollow">inion or conclusion Not Evident 0 (0%) - 0 (13%) Does not demonstrate exploration of issues and ideas before acceptin" rel="nofollow">ing or formin" rel="nofollow">ing an opin" rel="nofollow">inion or conclusion Feedback: Be sure to analyze the in" rel="nofollow">information that you are readin" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in order to provide evidence of critical thin" rel="nofollow">inkin" rel="nofollow">ing. Interpret what these thin" rel="nofollow">ings mean and are sayin" rel="nofollow">ing. Research0 (15%) Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 0 (14%) - 0 (15%) Incorporates many scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research Proficient 0 (12%) - 0 (13%) Incorporates some scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research Needs Improvement 0 (11%) - 0 (11%) Incorporates very few scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research Not Evident 0 (0%) - 0 (10%) Does not in" rel="nofollow">incorporate scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research Writin" rel="nofollow">ing (Mechanics/ Citations)0 (7%) Levels of Achievement: Exemplary 0 (9%) - 0 (10%) No errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Proficient 0 (8%) - 0 (8%) Min" rel="nofollow">inor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations Needs Improvement 0 (7%) - 0 (7%) Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations. Not Evident 0 (0%) - 0 (6%) Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations. Feedback: There are spellin" rel="nofollow">ing and grammar errors throughout your paper. Be sure to review and revise for fin" rel="nofollow">inal submission. One main" rel="nofollow">in poin" rel="nofollow">int, his name is Gaskin" rel="nofollow">ins. Raw Total: 0.00 (of 0.0) Feedback to Learner Erica, Please see my feedback throughout the work and above for your fin" rel="nofollow">inal draft. Good work overall. You are on the right path. Name:Crimin" rel="nofollow">inal Profile Rubric