500-word critical response paper on “The Aesthetic Objection to Terraforming
Mars.” Paper is split into 3 categories the paper should have:
Summary of author’s argument (170 words):
Identify the question the author is responding to.
Identifying the author’s position on that question.
Identifying the specific argument the author offers in favor of this position.
Response to the author’s argument (170 words):
Identifying a weak point in the argument and explaining why the author should be concerned; i.e.
somewhere where the author’s view can be responded to.
Your response to this criticism on behalf of the author (170 words):
Thinking about, and articulating, how the author might respond to the argument that you’ve raised against
them.
Sample Solution