Critical thinking

1. Should there be a death penalty for first-degree murder?
   Make an argument that either supports or opposes the use of the death penalty in first-degree murder cases.
   Be sure to define what is involved with first-degree murder and provide adequate reasoning and support for
   your argument.
2. Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the
   specific theories involved).
   Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?
   Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.

Sample Solution