Data Analysis and Interpretation in R

This is mucheasier, if you use the R Markdown command: you can convert your worksheet to HTML, word or PDF.Your submission should include:

  1. The code you used.
  2. The output from the code.
  3. Your written description of the interpretation of the output.

Problems

  1. Summarize the wage, height (both height85 and height81), and sibling variables. Discuss briefly.
  2. Create a scatterplot of wages and adult height which excludes the observations with wages above$500 per hour
  3. Create a scatterplot of wages and adult height (height85). Discuss any distinctive observations.
  4. Create a scatterplot of adult height against adolescent height. Identify the set of observationswhere peoples adolescent height is less than their adult height. Do you think we should use theseobservations in any future statistical analysis we conduct with this data? Why or why not?
  5. Do children on average have higher education than their father? Test the appropriate hypothesis.Compute and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the difference between father education andchilds education.
  6. Is there a relationship between fathers educational attainment and childs hourly wage? Test theappropriate hypothesis.
  7. Test the hypothesis that height influence the average hourly wage. Construct and interpret a 95%confidence interval.
  8. What other variables in the dataset do you think may affect usual hourly wage? Describe therelationship you may expect. What statistical tests would you use to determine if these relationshipsexist?
    Data Analysis and Interpretation in R This document provides a comprehensive analysis of a given dataset, summarizing variables, creating visualizations, and conducting hypothesis testing. The analysis is performed using R programming, and the results are interpreted to provide insights. Code and Output Below is the R code used for each problem along with the output and interpretations. 1. Summary of Variables # Load necessary libraries library(dplyr) # Assuming 'data' is your dataset summary_data <- data %>% summarise( wage_mean = mean(wage, na.rm = TRUE), wage_sd = sd(wage, na.rm = TRUE), height85_mean = mean(height85, na.rm = TRUE), height85_sd = sd(height85, na.rm = TRUE), height81_mean = mean(height81, na.rm = TRUE), height81_sd = sd(height81, na.rm = TRUE), sibling_mean = mean(sibling, na.rm = TRUE), sibling_sd = sd(sibling, na.rm = TRUE) ) print(summary_data) Output Interpretation The summary statistics provide an overview of the wage, height (both height85 and height81), and sibling variables. The means and standard deviations (SD) help understand the average values and variability within each variable. For instance, a high mean wage may indicate good earning potential in the sample, while a larger SD suggests significant disparities among individuals. 2. Scatterplot of Wages vs Adult Height (Excluding Wages > $500) # Filter and create scatterplot filtered_data <- data %>% filter(wage <= 500) plot(filtered_data$height85, filtered_data$wage, xlab = "Adult Height (Height85)", ylab = "Wage", main = "Scatterplot of Wages vs Adult Height") 3. Scatterplot of Wages vs Adult Height (Height85) plot(data$height85, data$wage, xlab = "Adult Height (Height85)", ylab = "Wage", main = "Scatterplot of Wages vs Adult Height (Height85)") Distinctive Observations In the scatterplot, we may observe a trend indicating that taller individuals tend to earn higher wages. However, some outliers could skew the interpretation, particularly those with extremely high wages. 4. Scatterplot of Adult Height vs Adolescent Height plot(data$height81, data$height85, xlab = "Adolescent Height (Height81)", ylab = "Adult Height (Height85)", main = "Scatterplot of Adult Height vs Adolescent Height") # Identify observations where adolescent height < adult height less_than_adult <- data %>% filter(height81 < height85) Discussion on Observations Observations where adolescent height is less than adult height may indicate individuals who experienced significant growth during adolescence. Excluding these observations could lead to biased results in future analyses since they represent a common growth pattern. 5. Education Comparison between Children and Fathers # Hypothesis test t_test_result <- t.test(data$child_education, data$father_education) print(t_test_result) # Confidence interval conf_interval <- t_test_result$conf.int print(conf_interval) Interpretation The t-test results indicate whether children have higher education levels than their fathers. The confidence interval provides a range within which we expect the true difference in educational attainment lies. 6. Relationship between Father's Education and Child's Hourly Wage # Linear regression analysis regression_result <- lm(wage ~ father_education, data=data) summary(regression_result) Interpretation The regression analysis determines if there is a statistically significant relationship between father's educational attainment and child's hourly wage. A significant p-value would indicate a relationship. 7. Testing Height's Influence on Hourly Wage # Linear model for height influence on wage height_wage_model <- lm(wage ~ height85, data=data) summary(height_wage_model) # Confidence interval for slope confint(height_wage_model) Interpretation The model assesses whether height influences hourly wage. A significant coefficient for height suggests that as height increases, so does the average wage. 8. Other Variables Affecting Hourly Wage In addition to height and education, other factors such as age, number of siblings, or work experience could influence hourly wage. To explore these relationships, multiple linear regression analysis could be conducted. Conclusion This R analysis delves into various aspects of the dataset to uncover meaningful insights regarding wages and their correlations with height and education. Each statistical test and visualization helps build a clearer picture of the underlying patterns in the data. Future research should consider additional variables and refine the model for more precise predictions.  

Sample Answer