demonstrates knowledge of the different forms of smoked and smokeless tobacco

Question 1 This answer demonstrates knowledge of the different forms of smoked and smokeless tobacco- There are numerous robust up to date references that can be used to justify the discussion. A number of the ones used here were quite old. Question 2 Some in" rel="nofollow">information about what is happenin" rel="nofollow">ing globally was in" rel="nofollow">included in" rel="nofollow">in the answer. A few more examples of how other countries are tryin" rel="nofollow">ing to reduce smokeless tobacco use would enhance the answer. Question 3 This question has not been correctly answered. It asks for a critical evaluation of one in" rel="nofollow">intervention used for smoked tobacco that can also be used to reduce smokeless tobacco use. Which particular in" rel="nofollow">intervention is bein" rel="nofollow">ing discussed as several were mentioned? There was little critical evaluation and the same reference from 1992 was used several times. There was no discussion of how any of the in" rel="nofollow">interventions lin" rel="nofollow">ink to health promotion theory. Question 4 This question has not been answered correctly. Although e-cigarettes were discussed the question asked for a comparison to be made between how e-cigarettes are marketed and how a smokin" rel="nofollow">ing cessation health promotion in" rel="nofollow">initiative is marketed. How do websites advertisin" rel="nofollow">ing e-cigarettes appear? What are the messages they want to advertise and how do these compare with the messages circulated by smokin" rel="nofollow">ing cessation campaigns or nicotin" rel="nofollow">ine replacement therapy websites? How do these messages relate to health promotion theory?