Depression in children and adolescents

Identify an instrument and do the following:
• Identify a scholarly, peer-reviewed article that addresses the use of the instrument.
• Discuss if the instrument is appropriate for diagnosing the condition it is designed to assess or if the developers of the instrument reported that the instrument is only part of a comprehensive assessment for the disorder.
• Describe whether the instrument can be used to measure patient response to therapy/treatment.
• Discuss the psychometrics/scoring of the instrument, including reliability and validity.
• Discuss any limitations associated with the use of the instrument.
Instruments/Tools for diagnosis of (one instrument/tool for each diagnosis):
• ADHD (children)
• Depression in children and adolescents

Full Answer Section

       

ADHD Assessment: The Conner's Rating Scales

Instrument: Conner's Rating Scales

Scholarly Article:

  • Reference: Connor, C. K., & Davidson, P. A. (2003). Conner's Rating Scales-Revised: Technical Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Appropriateness for Diagnosis: The Conner's Rating Scales are widely used for assessing ADHD symptoms in children and adolescents. While they are valuable tools for diagnosis, they should be used in conjunction with other clinical information, such as behavioral observations and interviews. The scales are not intended to be a standalone diagnostic tool but rather a helpful component of a comprehensive evaluation.

 

Sample Answer

       

Measuring Response to Treatment: The Conner's Rating Scales can be used to monitor changes in symptoms over time, making them useful for assessing treatment response. By administering the scales before and after treatment, clinicians can evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.

Psychometrics and Scoring: The Conner's Rating Scales have demonstrated good reliability and validity. They are available in various forms, including parent- and teacher-rating scales, which can provide complementary information. The scales are typically scored using standardized procedures, and the resulting scores can be compared to normative data to identify significant deviations.

Limitations: While the Conner's Rating Scales are a valuable tool for assessing ADHD, they have some limitations:

  • Subjectivity: The ratings are based on subjective reports from parents and teachers, which may be influenced by various factors, such as rater bias and mood.
  • Cultural Bias: The scales may not be equally valid and reliable across different cultural groups.
  • Limited Specificity: The scales may not be specific to ADHD and can sometimes identify symptoms of other disorders.

Depression Assessment in Children and Adolescents: The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI)

Scholarly Article:

  • Reference: Kovacs, M. (1992). The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Appropriateness for Diagnosis: The CDI is a self-report measure designed to assess depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. While it is not a diagnostic tool on its own, it can be a valuable tool for screening and monitoring depressive symptoms.

Measuring Response to Treatment: The CDI can be used to track changes in depressive symptoms over time, making it a useful tool for assessing treatment response. By administering the CDI before and after treatment, clinicians can evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.

Psychometrics and Scoring: The CDI has demonstrated good reliability and validity. It is a relatively short and easy-to-administer instrument that can be completed by children as young as seven years old. The scale is scored using standardized procedures, and the resulting scores can be compared to normative data to identify significant levels of depression.

Limitations:

  • Self-Report Bias: The CDI relies on self-report, which may be influenced by factors such as social desirability and cognitive biases.
  • Limited Sensitivity: The CDI may not be sensitive enough to detect mild or subclinical levels of depression.
  • Cultural Bias: The scale may not be equally valid and reliable across different cultural groups.

By understanding the strengths and limitations of these assessment tools, clinicians can make more informed decisions about diagnosis and treatment planning.