Design and arrangement of the electronic devices for super slim mobile phones

      Past researchers have suggested that as mobile phones have transited into handheld computers with consumers spending up to 10 hours a day texting, talking and using other Web services. The future of mobile communications suggests gadgets with more functions in smaller sized devices.Also, along with the features and structures of communication devices continuously perfect, make people producing two kinds of different requests to the development of the future mobile communication devices. One is as simple as possible only to have a natural communication function, while the other is to integrate as many services as possible. It is easy to see that there are disharmonic contradiction convenience and function versatility (Marti, 2005).Recent developments in the area of fabrication techniques offer the opportunity to create a large variety of functional devices (e.g., phone, video, net, and the control for personal data). Practical applications require integration of such devices into the compact and robust system (Masaharu. 2000).At the same time, current mobile communication devices do not grab our attention in a socially appropriate way. They could be disrespectful of ongoing social activity such as an important meeting or private dinner. Our mobile device not only lacks the capabilities to interact with us socially but also don't help us to integrate the two facets of communication, communication with co-located people and telecommunication with unknown people using mobile devices. Instead, mobile calls interrupt us at inappropriate times, such as during public performances, during crucial conversations with our superiors, etc. This is not acceptable for obvious reasons.Although modern communication devices allow us to set profiles manually for specific situations and caller groups, many still give us only the option to control our accessibility in a binary way—switch the phone off, or leave it on. This results in an unacceptable and frustrating trade-off between not being disturbed and possibly missing a call (as well as upsetting a caller) versus not losing any calls and being perhaps unnecessarily worried (and upsetting our co-located conversation partners).It is precisely for those situations—where interruption should only happen if appropriate—that we need communication devices that have (hopefully at least) a small idea about what is going on in our lives, or in other words, have some human-style "smarts" built-in (Yao, 20015).Bionics seeks to transcend our biological nature by replacing organic parts with artificial parts ("deflesh"), or by translating the human mind into information in a computer (Uploading). These processes are naturally highly speculative so far since we are still now from this technological level. However, in the field of connecting artificial limbs and other systems to nerves, some promising advances have already happened or seem probable shortly.Nevertheless, what is the future mobile communication devices defined, and what functions would it include? Which kinds of bionic joint and structure can be accepted for the mobile communication devices? Which driver should be applied? How is the dynamic capability of the bionic bone? How to partition the modules of the communication devices system?The intent of this task is research on the characteristic of mobile communication devices and the development of bionics, explore the enabling HW technology future mobile concepts, with the focuses on the flexibility, biomimicry, modularization and intelligent. It is targeted to provide a novel approach to creating highly functional, tiny terminals with the soft interaction between machines and humans. 1) What is the design and arrangement of the electronic devices for super slim mobile phones?2) What are the characteristics of the honeycomb structure?3) How is the bionic drive for the turn of BMCD?