disaster

disaster Order Description please, please be careful to use a correct reference to the relevant in" rel="nofollow">information. All of the references must be updated no less than 2010. You don’t need to use a master of English language; it is enough to be in" rel="nofollow">in an in" rel="nofollow">intermediate language. I will attach the markin" rel="nofollow">ing guidelin" rel="nofollow">ine as well as I will attach some references may help in" rel="nofollow">in the background part. The proposal aims to “explore the ethical issues among emergency nurses durin" rel="nofollow">ing a disaster event” a systematic review research question, devise a plan to answer it, and develop a protocol for the review and meta-analysis/meta-synthesis. A systematic review protocol is a complete outlin" rel="nofollow">ine of the process of undertakin" rel="nofollow">ing the review and plan for the analysis of the review data. The proposal should in" rel="nofollow">include the followin" rel="nofollow">ing: ● Proposal title: Make this short, descriptive and no more than 10-12 words; the title should explain" rel="nofollow">in succin" rel="nofollow">inctly what the project is about. ● Abstract: This must be no longer than 250 words; word count will be strictly enforced. It should in" rel="nofollow">include a statement of the problem, the aims and methods, and the significance of the proposed study. ● Review question, objectives, PICO (500 words): clearly identify the research problem to be in" rel="nofollow">investigated and state the review question and list the objectives of the review. Identify the PICO/PICo. Explain" rel="nofollow">in the significance of your study. On this proposal please followin" rel="nofollow">ing headin" rel="nofollow">ings; * the research problem=…….. *the review question= What are the ethical issues raised durin" rel="nofollow">ing a disaster event among emergency nurses? * the objectives=…….. *PICo = as the followin" rel="nofollow">ing P= Emergency nurses I= ethical issues Co= disaster event *the significant of the study= …….. ● Background (~1,500 words): Describe the background that relatin" rel="nofollow">ing to the topic of the study (i.e. the rationale or impetus for the study) and how the results might be used. Describe the clin" rel="nofollow">inical condition, population, in" rel="nofollow">interventions, comparisons, phenomenon and outcomes (as appropriate) with appropriate references. Provide a critical justification for the review. ● Review design: Discuss the specific type of systematic review bein" rel="nofollow">ing undertaken and justify why this particular approach is bein" rel="nofollow">ing undertaken ● Eligibility or Inclusion criteria: Detail the planned in" rel="nofollow">inclusion criteria in" rel="nofollow">includin" rel="nofollow">ing population or participants, in" rel="nofollow">interventions or the phenomenon, comparators, outcomes, timin" rel="nofollow">ing, settin" rel="nofollow">ing or context and language as appropriate to your systematic review design. These should be supported by references used to defin" rel="nofollow">ine and justify these elements, where appropriate. In addition, the types of studies for in" rel="nofollow">inclusion should be explain" rel="nofollow">ined. Specific exclusion criteria should be described and justified. ● Search Strategy: The search strategy should be detailed in" rel="nofollow">includin" rel="nofollow">ing the steps, data bases and search terms. The search strategy should represent a plan for a robust and exhaustive search of all the available evidence regardin" rel="nofollow">ing to the question. A draft of the specific terms to be used for at least one data base, in" rel="nofollow">includin" rel="nofollow">ing planned limits such that it could be repeated, should be in" rel="nofollow">included. ● Evidence Appraisal: the methods and process related to the selection and appraisal should be described. The plan for documentation of this process should be explain" rel="nofollow">ined. Planned tools used should be critiqued, appended and referenced. ● Analysis: Describe, usin" rel="nofollow">ing methodology-specific references, how you in" rel="nofollow">intend to extract and analyse the data collected. Additionally, if you propose to use software, clearly identify which software will be used and why. ● Rigour: Describe and justify the processes that will utilise to improve rigour and reduce bias in" rel="nofollow">in your review. Provide references to support your processes and justification. ● Ethical considerations: Discuss how you will apply ethical prin" rel="nofollow">inciples in" rel="nofollow">in your review. ● Dissemin" rel="nofollow">ination of fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings: Outlin" rel="nofollow">ine how you propose to share your fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings with others. (such as published in" rel="nofollow">in disaster journal or ethics journal. Addition, present fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ing to whom care such as emergency nurses. ● Timelin" rel="nofollow">ine: Provide a Gantt chart detailin" rel="nofollow">ing the steps in" rel="nofollow">in this review and time frame related to this undertakin" rel="nofollow">ing. Provide a reference list usin" rel="nofollow">ing APA 6th edition format, for all literature cited in" rel="nofollow">in the assignment. You can take some in" rel="nofollow">information from the followin" rel="nofollow">ing paragraph that can help in" rel="nofollow">in some parts of the proposal; The in" rel="nofollow">inclusion criteria should in" rel="nofollow">include all articles focusin" rel="nofollow">ing on the nursin" rel="nofollow">ing perspectives particularly for the terms used in" rel="nofollow">in PICo. For in" rel="nofollow">instance, any nurses have experience in" rel="nofollow">in a disaster event either clin" rel="nofollow">inically practice or admin" rel="nofollow">inistrative practice. The articles must be written in" rel="nofollow">in English language as a primary source either qualitative or quantitative research that focuse on the human species. The author is very in" rel="nofollow">interested to fin" rel="nofollow">ind updated studies, however, the date will not be limited in" rel="nofollow">in order to get multiple and broad aspects that associated with the ethical issues raised in" rel="nofollow">in disaster. As well as no geographic limit will be used durin" rel="nofollow">ing the search process in" rel="nofollow">in order to in" rel="nofollow">include the worldwide perspective of the ethical issues durin" rel="nofollow">ing the disaster event. Also, the age, gender and experience of the disaster nurses who have participated in" rel="nofollow">in the studies will not be considered. However, any articles discuss the adult care durin" rel="nofollow">ing a disaster will be in" rel="nofollow">includin" rel="nofollow">ing while any articles discuss a paediatric care will be excludin" rel="nofollow">ing. Furthermore, any published articles not written in" rel="nofollow">in English or other published documents rather than the primary articles will be excludin" rel="nofollow">ing. Also, any study not fit with the prin" rel="nofollow">inciple of keywords will be excludin" rel="nofollow">ing. Full access will help the author to fin" rel="nofollow">ind the precise in" rel="nofollow">information, but any article with a limited access will be excludin" rel="nofollow">ing. Besides, there is an exception for the articles that contain" rel="nofollow">ined a unique in" rel="nofollow">information will be purchased by the author. Ultimately, peer review articles, opin" rel="nofollow">inions and reports will be excludin" rel="nofollow">ing as well as any articles will participate any of the health care providers rather than nurses who in" rel="nofollow">involve in" rel="nofollow">in the disaster such as; physians.