If you embrace a Radical philosophy for curriculum, please tell us the relationship between politics and the radical curriculum tradition. What are some of the benefits that a radical tradition has brought to education? According to radicals, how is curriculum a source of oppression for students and society? Why do some radicals, for example, Paulo Freire, write a great deal about pedagogy and educational philosophy but not much about curriculum? How does faith inform Paulo Freire’s views? How did the early 1930s in the USA provide a unique opportunity for George Counts to espouse a radical curricular vision? What was controversial about Harold Rugg’s textbooks? Which of the commonplaces in the revolutionary tradition becomes most significant and why? Why is the relationship between theory and practice a problematic issue for radicals? In what way (or ways) can radical and systematic curricula are considered quite similar?
Sample Solution