environmental writing since Thoreau

In American Earth, read Henry David Thoreau's "Huckleberries"(page26) and read Rebecca Solnit's "The Thoreau Problem"(page 971). First, what is Thoreau's argument? Explain" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in it in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in your own words, and through judicious use of quotation. What is the value of the berry fields for Thoreau? what does he learn from goin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing berry pickin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing? how does he thin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ink land should be divided up and valued by humans? Does he agree with the way the land is bein" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing used at the time he is writin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing? Have thin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ings contin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inued along those trends? Second, what does Solnit argue about Thoreau? How has his work been in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">interpreted? Does she agree with the domin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inant in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">interpretations of his work? How would she like us to see him differently? And , what is the "Thoreau Problem"?