Using the course content and the steps to ethical problem solving https://www.naswma.org/page/100/Essential-Steps-for-Ethical-Problem-Solving.htm. complete a problem-solving approach to two of the case studies.
Then, read the case study:
Case Study 3: Juan has been referred for special education and you need to administer an achievement test in order for your team to come to a decision regarding his classification. Reading is very difficult for Juan and as you are administering the test you can tell that he is becoming more and more frustrated with his own reading abilities as you continue with the test. Finally, he falls into a heap on the floor and sobs. Juan begs you to please not make him read any more and that he just can’t do it. You haven’t reached any point in the test where you have gained any useful information. What should you do?
Ethical Problem Solving in Social Work: Case Study Analysis
Ethical Problem Solving in Social Work: Case Study Analysis
Introduction
Ethical dilemmas are inherent in social work practice, requiring professionals to navigate challenging situations with compassion, integrity, and respect for clients' rights. This essay will analyze Case Study 3 using the steps to ethical problem-solving provided by the National Association of Social Workers (NASW).
Case Study 3: Juan's Test Administration
Juan, who has been referred for special education, is struggling with reading during an achievement test administered to determine his classification. As Juan becomes increasingly frustrated and emotional, he breaks down in tears, expressing his inability to continue with the test. Despite not obtaining useful information up to that point, Juan's emotional distress raises concerns about his well-being, dignity, and the ethical administration of assessments.
Step 1: Identify the Problem
The primary issue in this case is Juan's emotional distress and inability to continue with the reading test. The social worker must balance the need for assessment information with Juan's well-being and dignity during the testing process.
Step 2: Apply NASW Code of Ethics
The NASW Code of Ethics highlights the importance of promoting client well-being, respecting clients' self-determination, and protecting vulnerable individuals from harm. In this case, ensuring Juan's emotional safety and addressing his distress take precedence over completing the assessment.
Step 3: Consult with Colleagues
Collaborating with colleagues can provide insights into alternative assessment methods, strategies for supporting Juan's emotional needs, and ethical considerations in administering tests to individuals experiencing distress.
Step 4: Consider Possible Courses of Action
1. Pause the Assessment: Stop the test immediately to address Juan's emotional state and provide support.
2. Engage in Discussion: Talk to Juan about his feelings, validate his experiences, and assure him that his well-being is a priority.
3. Explore Alternative Assessment Methods: Consider alternative ways to gather information about Juan's abilities that do not trigger emotional distress or harm.
Step 5: Evaluate Options and Make a Decision
In this situation, prioritizing Juan's emotional well-being and respecting his distress is essential. The social worker should halt the assessment, engage in supportive communication with Juan, and explore alternative assessment methods that do not compromise his dignity or mental health.
Conclusion
Ethical problem-solving in social work requires a client-centered approach that prioritizes empathy, respect, and sensitivity to individual needs. By following a structured ethical decision-making process like the one outlined by NASW, social workers can navigate challenging situations while upholding ethical standards and promoting client well-being. In Case Study 3, addressing Juan's emotional distress, halting the assessment to ensure his safety, and exploring alternative assessment approaches are critical steps in maintaining ethical practice and fostering a supportive environment for clients.