(1) Describe the veil of ignorance. Why does Rawls think that this will produce a just distribution of
goods?
(2) Describe the difference between moral desert and reasonable expectations of entitlement. Why
does this matter for an account of justice?
(3) What does Rawls get right about justice?
(4) What problems do you see with Rawls' moral philosophy? How might either a utilitarian or
libertarian evaluate Rawls' moral claims?
Sample Solution