Evidence Based Practice Proposal

      Evidence Based Practice Proposal - Section B: Problem DescriptionDetails:Write a paper of 500-750 words (not in" rel="nofollow">includin" rel="nofollow">ing the title page and reference page) on your proposed problem description for your EBP project. The paper should address the followin" rel="nofollow">ing:1 Describe the background of the problem. Tell the story of the issue and why it deserves attention.2 Identify the stakeholders/change agents. Who, or what organizations, are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. List the in" rel="nofollow">interested parties, patients, students, agencies, Join" rel="nofollow">int Commission, etc.3 Use the feedback from the Topic 2 main" rel="nofollow">in forum post and refin" rel="nofollow">ine your PICOT question. Make sure that the question fits with your graduate degree specialization.4 State the purpose and project objectives in" rel="nofollow">in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. The objective should address what is to be gain" rel="nofollow">ined. This is a restatement of the question, providin" rel="nofollow">ing focus. Measurements need to be taken before and after the evidence-based practice is in" rel="nofollow">introduced to identify the expected changes.5 5) Provide supportive rationale that the problem or issue is an important one for nursin" rel="nofollow">ing to resolve usin" rel="nofollow">ing relevant professional literature sources.6 Develop an in" rel="nofollow">initial reference list to assure that there is adequate literature to support your evidence-based practice project. Follow the "Steps to an Efficient Search to Answer a Clin" rel="nofollow">inical Question" box in" rel="nofollow">in chapter 3 of the textbook. Use "NUR-699 Search Method Example" to assist you.7 7) The majority of references should be research articles. However, national sources such as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Department of Health and Human Resources (HHS), or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and others may be used when you are gatherin" rel="nofollow">ing statistics to provide the rationale for the problem.8 Once you get in" rel="nofollow">into the literature, you may fin" rel="nofollow">ind there is very little research to support your topic and you will have to start all over again" rel="nofollow">in. Remember, in" rel="nofollow">in order for this to be an evidence- based project, you must have enough evidence to in" rel="nofollow">introduce this as a practice change. If you fin" rel="nofollow">ind that you do not have enough supportin" rel="nofollow">ing evidence to change a practice, then further research would need to be conducted.Prepare this assignment accordin" rel="nofollow">ing to the APA guidelin" rel="nofollow">ines found in" rel="nofollow">in the APA Style Guide, located in" rel="nofollow">in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to begin" rel="nofollow">innin" rel="nofollow">ing the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin" rel="nofollow">in. Please refer to the directions in" rel="nofollow">in the Student Success Center.Upon receivin" rel="nofollow">ing feedback from the in" rel="nofollow">instructor, refin" rel="nofollow">ine "Section B: Problem Description" for your fin" rel="nofollow">inal submission. This will be a contin" rel="nofollow">inuous process throughout the course for each section.NUR699.R.SearchMethod_student.docx Apply RubricsEvidence-Based Practice Proposal - Section B: Problem Description   1Unsatisfactory0.00% 2Less than Satisfactory80.00% 3Satisfactory88.00% 4Good92.00% 5Excellent100.00% 100.0 %Problem Description  100.0 %Describe the background of the problem. Identify the stakeholders/change agents and list the in" rel="nofollow">interested parties. Provide the PICOT question. State the purpose and project objectives in" rel="nofollow">in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. Develop an in" rel="nofollow">initial reference list. There is no discernible problem description and/or objectives. The problem selection rationale is not addressed or is min" rel="nofollow">inimally addressed. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are not addressed or are min" rel="nofollow">inimally addressed. Inaccurate comprehension of material and lack the ability to apply in" rel="nofollow">information is revealed. Subject matter is absent, in" rel="nofollow">inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Initial reference list is missin" rel="nofollow">ing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meanin" rel="nofollow">ing. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. The problem description and objectives are addressed, but not all components are in" rel="nofollow">included. Alignment is difficult to discern. The problem is not in" rel="nofollow">in the correct format. Objectives are lackin" rel="nofollow">ing measurement or may be ambiguous. The problem selection rationale is not addressed or is min" rel="nofollow">inimally in" rel="nofollow">introduced with no supportin" rel="nofollow">ing details. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are listed. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply in" rel="nofollow">information. A partial in" rel="nofollow">initial reference list is developed. There is weak, margin" rel="nofollow">inal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in" rel="nofollow">in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in" rel="nofollow">in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. The problem description and objectives are stated but may not be fully developed or aligned. The problem is in" rel="nofollow">in the PICOT format but not appropriately developed. Objectives are measurable but may be ambiguous. The problem selection rationale is present but the significance is unclear. Expected changes are briefly in" rel="nofollow">introduced. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to in" rel="nofollow">integrate and apply in" rel="nofollow">information. All subject matter is covered in" rel="nofollow">in min" rel="nofollow">inimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distractin" rel="nofollow">ing to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. The problem description and objectives are presented and tie together. The stakeholders/change agents - who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal - are identified. The problem is in" rel="nofollow">in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable. The problem selection is justified usin" rel="nofollow">ing literature. Expected changes are outlin" rel="nofollow">ined. An in" rel="nofollow">initial reference list is developed. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and in" rel="nofollow">information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. The problem description and objectives are presented in" rel="nofollow">in detail and align. The stakeholders/change agents - who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal - are described. The problem is in" rel="nofollow">in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable. The problem selection is justified usin" rel="nofollow">ing literature and supportive examples, not just based on the most current evidence. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are in" rel="nofollow">integrated. An in" rel="nofollow">initial reference list is developed. Clarity and specificity of comprehension are demonstrated, and all relevant in" rel="nofollow">information is synthesized. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in" rel="nofollow">in command of standard, written, academic English.