Evidence that indicates perception/comprehension can (and perhaps often) precedes production.

Question 1 In 150-300 words, please provide a clear, concise answer to the following question. Your answer will be graded on completeness, accuracy, and relevance to the question. Make sure to use your own words and not to use direct quotations from any materials. Pick one study we have discussed this semester. Discuss the methods (test population, procedure, etc.) results, and why the test was conducted (what were they trying to prove or disprove). You can use any study from my lectures or the textbooks. You may also find it helpful to review Gerken Ch. 10 for your discussion of test procedure. For the question 1, please read text book, Language Development. It written by LouAnn Gerken. And pick up one study to write in Chapter 10, some methods used in Language Development Research. Question 2 In 150-300 words, please provide a clear, concise answer to the following question. Your answer will be graded on completeness, accuracy, and relevance to the question. Make sure to use your own words and not to use direct quotations from any materials. Briefly discuss some piece of evidence that indicates perception/comprehension can (and perhaps often) precedes production. This can be accomplished in any domain (phonology, morphology, syntax). Discuss any relevant studies that have contributed to our knowledge of the perception or production in a particular domain. (Hint: you probably have to discuss one for perception and one for production to show they do not occur at the same time). Question 3 In 300-400 words, please provide a clear, concise answer to the following question. Make sure that your answer includes a clear thesis statement, well-developed support, and a conclusion. Your answer will be graded on completeness, precision, and accuracy. Make sure to use your own words and not to use direct quotations from any materials. Is there a critical period for language? Using one piece of evidence from normally developing bilingual or multilingual acquisition, one from language development in special populations (e.g. congenitally blind or deaf children; children with autism or SLI), and one from normally developing monolingual children (three pieces total), provide a clear, detailed response. Make sure to include a specific example from each of the populations mentioned above, as well as an explanation for why this piece of evidence is important and how it fits in with the larger body of evidence. You can do question 2, 3 first. I am going to pick up one study for question 1. Question 1 Provide a clear, concise answer to the following question. Your answer will be graded on completeness, accuracy, and relevance to the question. Make sure to use your own words and not to use direct quotations from any materials. Pick one study we have discussed this semester. Discuss the methods (test population, procedure, etc.) results, and why the test was conducted (what were they trying to prove or disprove). You can use any study from my lectures or the textbooks. You may also find it helpful to review Gerken Ch. 10 for your discussion of test procedure. Question 2 Provide a clear, concise answer to the following question. Your answer will be graded on completeness, accuracy, and relevance to the question. Make sure to use your own words and not to use direct quotations from any materials. Briefly discuss some piece of evidence that indicates perception/comprehension can (and perhaps often) precedes production. This can be accomplished in any domain (phonology, morphology, syntax). Discuss any relevant studies that have contributed to our knowledge of the perception or production in a particular domain. (Hint: you probably have to discuss one for perception and one for production to show they do not occur at the same time). Question 3 Provide a clear, concise answer to the following question. Make sure that your answer includes a clear thesis statement, well-developed support, and a conclusion. Your answer will be graded on completeness, precision, and accuracy. Make sure to use your own words and not to use direct quotations from any materials. Is there a critical period for language? Using one piece of evidence from normally developing bilingual or multilingual acquisition, one from language development in special populations (e.g. congenitally blind or deaf children; children with autism or SLI), and one from normally developing monolingual children (three pieces total), provide a clear, detailed response. Make sure to include a specific example from each of the populations mentioned above, as well as an explanation for why this piece of evidence is important and how it fits in with the larger body of evidence.                                                                                                                                    

Sample Solution