Failed Offshoring Decision: Mattel Inc.

Increased globalization and improved technologies have resulted in a variety of options for companies to locate their facilities. Facility location decisions affect the efficiency and effectiveness of managing supply chains and can make the difference between profit and loss.
Discuss
Find a firm that has failed in its location decision (preferably firms that failed in their offshoring decision-making). Provide a brief background about the firm, the selected location, and list the major issues faced by the firm.

  Failed Offshoring Decision: Mattel Inc. Background Mattel Inc., a renowned American multinational toy manufacturing company, decided to offshore a significant portion of its production to China in the early 2000s. This move was primarily driven by the desire to reduce manufacturing costs and take advantage of the lower labor expenses in China. However, this decision led to unforeseen challenges and ultimately proved to be detrimental to the company's operations. Selected Location Mattel Inc. chose to establish manufacturing facilities in several regions across China, including Guangdong and Shanghai, to capitalize on the country's vast labor force and cost-effective production capabilities. Major Issues Faced by the Firm 1. Quality Control Problems: One of the major issues faced by Mattel Inc. was related to quality control. The company struggled with maintaining consistent quality standards across its offshore facilities, leading to numerous product recalls due to safety concerns, such as lead paint in toys. 2. Supply Chain Disruptions: Operating offshore introduced complexities in managing the supply chain effectively. Mattel Inc. encountered logistical challenges, delays in production, and difficulties in coordinating with overseas suppliers, resulting in disruptions and increased costs. 3. Reputational Damage: The quality control issues and product recalls not only impacted the company financially but also tarnished its reputation. Mattel Inc. faced backlash from consumers, regulatory authorities, and stakeholders, leading to a loss of trust in the brand. 4. Increased Costs: Contrary to the initial objective of reducing expenses, offshoring to China ended up being more costly for Mattel Inc. The expenses associated with addressing quality issues, managing supply chain disruptions, and conducting product recalls outweighed the anticipated cost savings. 5. Legal and Compliance Challenges: The offshoring decision exposed Mattel Inc. to legal and compliance risks, especially concerning product safety regulations. The company had to navigate complex regulatory environments in China and other markets, facing penalties and legal repercussions. Conclusion The case of Mattel Inc.'s failed offshoring decision serves as a cautionary tale for companies considering relocating their facilities to capitalize on globalization and cost advantages. Strategic facility location decisions are crucial for the success of supply chain management and overall business performance. It underscores the importance of thoroughly evaluating all factors, including quality control, supply chain resilience, reputation management, cost implications, and legal considerations, before making such critical decisions.      

Sample Answer