Watch Gandhi (1982), This is for an innovation class.
Comment on whether Gandhi’s methods of nonviolent resistance meet our definition of innovation.
Some points to consider:
What kind of innovation was he pursuing?
Can his innovation be termed disruptive?
Could the incumbent (in this case, the British Empire) have done anything to prevent Gandhi’s success?
If you don’t think this meets the definition of innovation, explain why not.
Could Gandhi have done something differently that in your eyes would have raised him to the level of an innovator and entrepreneur?
Sample Solution