General & Special Duties towards compatriots and non­compatriots

Paper details: You are required to answer the followin" rel="nofollow">ing essay question. It is commonly thought that special duties to fellow compatriots take priority ovÕÉ≠†Њ†er general duties of justice owed to non­compatriots in" rel="nofollow">in other countries. Accordin" rel="nofollow">ing to Robert Goodin" rel="nofollow">in, however, ‘In the present world system, it is often – perhaps ordin" rel="nofollow">inarily – wrong to give priority to the claims of our compatriots’ (1988: 686). Explain" rel="nofollow">in and critically assess the argument via which Goodin" rel="nofollow">in reaches this conclusion. Please submit your work in" rel="nofollow">in the followin" rel="nofollow">ing format: the essay topic to be addressed should be reproduced in" rel="nofollow">in full at the top of page 1; 1.5 or double lin" rel="nofollow">ine spacin" rel="nofollow">ing should be used; to in" rel="nofollow">indicate paragraph breaks either in" rel="nofollow">indent or leave a blank lin" rel="nofollow">ine between them; font size should be 11 or 12; and pages should be numbered. Also while writin" rel="nofollow">ing please consider the followin" rel="nofollow">ing: Do you clearly state what you are tryin" rel="nofollow">ing to accomplish in" rel="nofollow">in your paper? Is it obvious to the reader what your main" rel="nofollow">in thesis is? Do you offer supportin" rel="nofollow">ing arguments for the claims you make? Is it obvious to the reader what these arguments are? Is the structure of your paper clear? For in" rel="nofollow">instance, is it clear what parts of your paper are expository, and what parts are your own positive contribution? Is your prose simple, easy to read, and easy to understand? Do you illustrate your claims with good examples? Do you explain" rel="nofollow">in your central notions? Do you say exactly what you mean? Do you present other authors' views accurately and charitably? Do you engage with counterarguments or opposin" rel="nofollow">ing evidence?