Health Care Administration Problem Implementation and Analysis

Health Care Admin" rel="nofollow">inistration Problem Implementation and Analysis Paper details: Usin" rel="nofollow">ing the references you identified in" rel="nofollow">in the last Topic, write a first draft of your paper, with a length between 2,500 and 3,000 words, typed and double-spaced. Integrate concepts from previous Topics in" rel="nofollow">into the paper, as well as communication concepts. 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 70.0 %Health Care Admin" rel="nofollow">inistration Problem Implementation and Analysis Central purpose or argument of the problem statement is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident. The reader is confused or may be misin" rel="nofollow">informed. Information supports the problem statement at times. Analysis is basic or general. Reader gain" rel="nofollow">ins few in" rel="nofollow">insights. Information provides reasonable support for the problem statement and displays evidence of a basic analysis. The reader gain" rel="nofollow">ins some in" rel="nofollow">insights. Most of the in" rel="nofollow">information presented is relevant and legitimate to the problem statement. The in" rel="nofollow">information supports the overall scope of the problem statement and the argument shows a thoughtful, in" rel="nofollow">in-depth analysis. The reader gain" rel="nofollow">ins important in" rel="nofollow">insights in" rel="nofollow">into the problem statement. Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate in" rel="nofollow">information that clearly supports the problem statement and shows a thoughtful, in" rel="nofollow">in-depth analysis. Reader gain" rel="nofollow">ins important in" rel="nofollow">insights and application. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizin" rel="nofollow">ing claim. Thesis and/or main" rel="nofollow">in claim are in" rel="nofollow">insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main" rel="nofollow">in claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main" rel="nofollow">in claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main" rel="nofollow">in claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contain" rel="nofollow">ined within" rel="nofollow">in the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is in" rel="nofollow">incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lackin" rel="nofollow">ing. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in" rel="nofollow">in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few in" rel="nofollow">inconsistencies. The argument presents min" rel="nofollow">inimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from in" rel="nofollow">introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convin" rel="nofollow">incin" rel="nofollow">ing argument that presents a persuasive claim in" rel="nofollow">in a distin" rel="nofollow">inctive and compellin" rel="nofollow">ing manner. All sources are authoritative. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writin" rel="nofollow">ing (in" rel="nofollow">includes spellin" rel="nofollow">ing, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meanin" rel="nofollow">ing. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in" rel="nofollow">in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distractin" rel="nofollow">ing to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in" rel="nofollow">in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missin" rel="nofollow">ing or mistaken. A lack of control with formattin" rel="nofollow">ing is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formattin" rel="nofollow">ing is correct, although some min" rel="nofollow">inor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in" rel="nofollow">in formattin" rel="nofollow">ing style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasin" rel="nofollow">ing and reference page listin" rel="nofollow">ing and formattin" rel="nofollow">ing, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is in" rel="nofollow">included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are in" rel="nofollow">inconsistently used. Reference page is in" rel="nofollow">included and lists sources used in" rel="nofollow">in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully in" rel="nofollow">inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage