For a healthcare organization to be politically viable they must have influential stakeholders. In that, the stakeholders must understand limitations and be able to adopt accordingly. Discuss the following:
Highlight and present one key player/stakeholder (i.e., federal, state, or local) in political health policy in your state.
Choose two state/local/federal healthcare organizations. Then, compare and contrast their political viability in terms of one/more of their health polic(ies).
Apply the “method for analyzing political feasibility”
Full Answer Section
Choose two state/local/federal healthcare organizations. Then, compare and contrast their political viability in terms of one/more of their health polic(ies).
Here are two state/local/federal healthcare organizations that I will compare and contrast in terms of their political viability:
- Kaiser Permanente: Kaiser Permanente is a large, nonprofit health plan that operates in California and several other states. Kaiser Permanente is a politically viable organization because it has a large and loyal membership base. Kaiser Permanente is also well-respected by policymakers and other stakeholders.
- San Francisco General Hospital: San Francisco General Hospital is a public hospital that provides care to low-income and uninsured patients. San Francisco General Hospital is a politically viable organization because it is essential to the health care safety net in San Francisco. San Francisco General Hospital is also well-connected to policymakers and other stakeholders.
Apply the “method for analyzing political feasibility”
The method for analyzing political feasibility is a tool that can be used to assess the likelihood of a policy being implemented. The method involves identifying the key stakeholders who will be affected by the policy, assessing their level of support or opposition to the policy, and determining whether there is a sufficient majority in favor of the policy to overcome opposition.
In the case of Kaiser Permanente and San Francisco General Hospital, both organizations are likely to be politically viable in terms of their health policies. Kaiser Permanente has a large and loyal membership base, which gives it a strong base of support. San Francisco General Hospital is essential to the health care safety net in San Francisco, which gives it strong political support.
However, there are some potential challenges that could affect the political viability of these organizations. For example, Kaiser Permanente could face opposition from policymakers who are concerned about the rising cost of health care. San Francisco General Hospital could face opposition from policymakers who are concerned about the quality of care at public hospitals.
Overall, the political viability of Kaiser Permanente and San Francisco General Hospital is likely to depend on a number of factors, including the level of support from their stakeholders, the political climate, and the specific health policies that they are trying to implement.
Sample Answer
Highlight and present one key player/stakeholder (i.e., federal, state, or local) in political health policy in your state.
In my state of California, one key player/stakeholder in political health policy is the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). CDPH is a state agency that is responsible for protecting and improving the health of all Californians. CDPH has a number of responsibilities, including:
- Licensing and regulating healthcare facilities
- Providing public health education and outreach
- Monitoring and responding to public health emergencies
- Conducting research on public health issues
CDPH is a powerful stakeholder in political health policy because it has the ability to influence the implementation of health policies at the state level. CDPH can also provide technical assistance and guidance to other stakeholders, such as healthcare organizations and local governments.