Humanitarian Action

Humanitarian Action Order Description Instructions: The outlin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ine has to follow a non-dialectical scheme, the struture bein" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing composed of different problematised thematical dimensions of the answer the core question (ex. «To what extent has the state’s role in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in worls politics been weakened?» --> 1. The challenges to the state’s classic role (A. global issues limitin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing the state’s efficiency B. The rise of non state actors ) 2. A contrasted result on classic state power (A. Resilience of some states B. Weakenin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing or collapse of other states) ). In both cases, readin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing the outlin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ines (the titles of the parts and subparts) must be sufficient to understand the progression and dilemmas of the answer. Each subpart and argument must be systematically illustrated empirically , i.e. refer to concrete facts, events, data. Be careful to quote the source of the data you use. So My Core question is: Is traditional humanitarianism less harmful than new humanitarianism ? Outlin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ine (not fin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inal version) 1. New humanitarianism : a result of a changin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing landscape A. Challenges faced by traditional humanitarianism (ideas: prin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inciples of traditional humanitarianism, security challenge, risin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing of different actors in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">involvin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing humanitarian aid) B. Emergence of or Consensus on a in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">international legal framework (ideas : consequences of changes : development cannot be achieved without stability / peace; growin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ing in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">institutionalization of human rights; humanitarian emergencies viewed as a security issue) 2. New humanitarianism : in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">instrument of power domin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ination ? A. The liberal peace as new paradigm of humanitarian aid (ideas : in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in the post cold war era, huge in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">increase of the budget dedicated to humanitarian aid, however it is conditioned by structural adjustments [“selective aid”] : paradoxe of the very aim of humanitarianism) B. ? Don't know Sources : please quote the source of the data you use. Email me : [email protected] (I will send material)