Mentioning 'behavioural theories of leadership' is not enough. Where is the actual review of theories and why is
the study not connected to the theories further? Please relate to them the content from Results in Discussion.
Do not exceed 6600 words.
Mind your grammar and formulations, e.g. create a particular aspect of coding that provided a clear picture of
the whole of the research studies.
What are thematic codes?
'These elements will be used in the next chapter to discuss the themes…' - what you listed are actually themes or
rather subheadings, not 'elements' or 'thematic codes'. More so, those are based on the research questions, not
themes and codes. You literally copied the subheadings from Results.
Provide a proper data analysis subsection with explanations of how data was analyzed - provide a type of
analysis. It is definitely not thematic one if subheadings correspond to research questions.
Conclusion still should be rewritten to remove the similarity.
Regards.
Description
Enclose attachment of full and clear instructions within the additional materials
It is important that you first assess its viability as a project. Some questions you might wish to consider are:
- Does it fall within the field of Business or closely-related fields such as project management i.e. relate to
managing projects or resources? - Is the topic of personal interest?
- Does it provide opportunities for career development?
- Is the topic seen as a problem or issue by the organisation and will the organisation be supportive?
- Where appropriate, does the organisation keep records and in an accessible form where such data are central to
the research? - Is the organisation willing to provide access to relevant documents, records or people to whom you may wish
to speak? - Does a significant literature exist in the selected field?
- Could the topic (or aspects of it) be seen as ‘sensitive’?
Sample Solution