This essay should be about four to six pages long (without including title page and list of cited references). This essay prompt asks that you engage in a reflection about the course's contents (no library research is needed; engaging only with the textbook's contents and other course materials is required). You must:
a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who Turned Away Gay Couple” Briefly summarize the case.
b] Read the New York Times article, “British Jury Delivers First Conviction for Female Genital Cutting” Briefly summarize the case.
c] Use as many specific concepts and contents (no vague reference accepted) from this course to develop a sophisticated discussion of the significance of these two cases when considered together. Indeed, they contrast meaningfully: the first case is decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in favor of a religious perspective and at the detriment, perhaps, of "individual sexual rights," while the second could be seen as promoting individual rights by limiting the reach of religious and cultural traditions--some of which are criminalized by law (female genital cutting). In this section of your essay, you should engage in a discussion of all aspects of the contrast made by the two cases (two NYT articles) you find most relevant in the development of your sophisticated argument. That argument should make as many references to the course's contents as possible and relevant. This section of your essay may not focus on one of the articles only. It must focus instead on the significance of the contrast between both cases, vis-à-vis human rights and religious rights.