Information Security

DescriptionWrite a review of at least five papers (attached) in" rel="nofollow">in the area of in" rel="nofollow">information security.What follows here is a general recommendation on how you can structure your solutions to the assignments in" rel="nofollow">in the courses Decision Theory and Risk Management. In short, it consists of the followin" rel="nofollow">ing outlin" rel="nofollow">ine: 1. Summary 2. Interpretation, analysis and discussion 3. Conclusion Note that you don’t have to follow it slavishly. However, if you aren’t used to produce the sort of works we are askin" rel="nofollow">ing for, then it could prove to be quite helpful. Summary In the summary section you should, as the name implies, summarize the material. A correct summary shows that you have at least read the text. In addition it makes it easy for the examin" rel="nofollow">iners to see if someone would seem to have missed somethin" rel="nofollow">ing of importance. The summary should be written such that someone who is acquain" rel="nofollow">inted with the field but have yet to read the text can understand it. Consequently you must not leave out important details. Note also that a summary shouldn’t be a set of quotations from the origin" rel="nofollow">inal text, and that your paraphrase mustn’t be too close to the origin" rel="nofollow">inal source. 1 Interpretation, analysis and discussion Sin" rel="nofollow">ince a text usually can be in" rel="nofollow">interpreted in" rel="nofollow">in different ways dependin" rel="nofollow">ing upon the person who reads it, it’s important that you present your own understandin" rel="nofollow">ing of the presented material. In many cases it would be possible for someone to write a summary, albeit the in" rel="nofollow">individual doesn’t have any expert knowledge within" rel="nofollow">in the actual field. However, bein" rel="nofollow">ing able to present a meanin" rel="nofollow">ingful in" rel="nofollow">interpretation requires a deeper understandin" rel="nofollow">ing, which is exactly what we want you to acquire. When writin" rel="nofollow">ing your analysis and discussion, which isn’t necessarily disconnected from the in" rel="nofollow">interpretative part, you are supposed to critically examin" rel="nofollow">ine the content of the material under review. It is imperative that you, in" rel="nofollow">in addition to statin" rel="nofollow">ing your fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings, also present your supportin" rel="nofollow">ing arguments. Conclusion The conclusion should be a short and succin" rel="nofollow">inct summary of what you found under the previous section. Although it might feel a bit repetitious it can certain" rel="nofollow">inly help in" rel="nofollow">in clarifyin" rel="nofollow">ing and underlin" rel="nofollow">inin" rel="nofollow">ing the most important fin" rel="nofollow">indin" rel="nofollow">ings. Lastly it provides a good foundation for a fin" rel="nofollow">inal check of whether or not you agree with yourself.