Is it useful to present the development of IR Theory as a series of Great Debates

Is it useful to present the development of IR Theory as a series of Great Debates clin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inic semin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">inar tutor gave some tips for this question and possible references (I uploaded reference doc) [First of all you need to defin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ine what does it mean to be useful? Useful for whom? Students? Scholars of IR? Does the answer to the question depend on the audience? Focus of the question = positives and negatives of the Great Debates narrative ] [You need to thin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ink about what the narrative does To do well in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in this question you need highlight the implications of the Great Debate narrative for our understandin" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">in" rel="nofollow">ings of world politics]