Is There a Maximum Rate of Pay?

You are the Total Rewards Manager for Front Appliance Company. You are usually a pretty relaxed, friendly, and easy-going manager. Although you are a no-nonsense, competent executive, you are one of the most popular managers in the company. This particular morning, however, you feel a challenge ahead.

As chair of Front’s job evaluation committee, you called a late-morning meeting at which several jobs were to be considered for re-evaluation. The jobs had already been rated and assigned to Pay Grade 4. But the Office Manager, Ortho Janson, was upset that one of his employees was not rated higher. To press the issue, Ortho had taken his case to two executives who were members of the job evaluation committee. The two executives (Production Manager Peter Strong and Marketing Manager Margo Arms) then requested that the job ratings be reviewed. Peter and Margo supported Ortho’s side of the dispute, and you are not looking forward to the confrontation that is almost certain to occur.
The controversial job is that of receptionist. Only one receptionist position exists at Front Appliances, and Rebecca Reichart held it. Rebecca has been with the firm 14 years, longer than any of the committee members. She is extremely efficient, and virtually all the executives in the company, including the president, have noticed and commented on her outstanding work. Peter and Margo are particularly pleased with Rebecca because of the cordial manner in which she greets and accommodates Front’s customers and vendors, who frequently visit the plant. They feel that Rebecca projects a positive image of the company.

To begin the meeting, you say the following:
(Fill in what you would say.)
But before you can finish, Peter interrupts: “I suggest we start with Rebecca.” Margo nods in agreement. When you regain your composure, you quietly but firmly assert:
(Fill in what you would say.)
Then you proceed to pass out copies of the receptionist job description to Peter and Margo, who are visibly irritated.

Continue in the meeting and lead the discussion, in a conversational tone as if Rebecca were also in the room.

  1. Explain to the group why you insist that the job, not the person, be evaluated.
  2. Share with the others whether or not you think there should be a maximum rate of pay for every job in an organization, regardless of how well the job is being performed. Justify your response.
  3. Rebecca is earning the maximum of the range for her pay grade. Discuss ways an employee at the top of his/her pay range might be able to obtain a salary increase. Be specific and give good examples that Rebecca might also be able to apply easily to her situation.
find the cost of your paper

Sample Answer

 

 

 

 

“Good morning, everyone. Thanks for coming. As you know, we’re here today to review several job evaluations, specifically those assigned to Pay Grade 4. I understand there are some concerns, and I want to ensure we follow a fair and consistent process. We’ve all agreed that this process is to re-evaluate the job, not the individual holding the job, and I want to make sure we stick to that agreement today. Let’s start by reviewing the established criteria for Pay Grade 4…”

(Peter interrupts)

“Peter, Margo, I understand your desire to discuss Rebecca’s situation. However, I must insist that we adhere to our established job evaluation process. This process is designed to ensure fairness and consistency across all roles within Front Appliances. Evaluating the job, not the individual, is fundamental to this principle. Focusing on the person rather than the job creates bias and undermines the entire system. It can also open the company up to legal challenges. Therefore, we will be reviewing the receptionist job description and its assigned pay grade, regardless of who occupies the position.”

Full Answer Section

 

 

 

 

 

(Distribute job descriptions)

“As you can see, this document outlines the responsibilities, required skills, and level of complexity associated with the receptionist role. Our task today is to determine if the current Pay Grade 4 accurately reflects these elements. We’ll be using our standard job evaluation worksheet, focusing on compensable factors like knowledge, skill, problem-solving, and accountability. Let’s begin by discussing the knowledge and skills required for this position…”

(Lead the discussion, referencing the job description and worksheet. After discussing each compensable factor, address the following questions):

1. Why evaluate the job, not the person?

“It’s essential to evaluate the job, not the person, for several reasons. First, it ensures objectivity. We’re looking at the inherent value of the position to the organization, not the performance of the individual currently holding it. Performance is measured separately through performance reviews and merit increases. Second, it promotes fairness and equity. If we evaluate based on the individual, we risk inconsistencies and potential bias. What happens when that highly-performing individual leaves? Does the job suddenly become less valuable? Third, it protects the company legally. Basing pay on individual performance opens the door to claims of favoritism or even discrimination. A structured job evaluation process, focused on the job itself, mitigates these risks. Finally, it provides a consistent framework for all positions within the company, making it easier to manage compensation and benefits.”

2. Should there be a maximum rate of pay for every job?

“Yes, I believe there should be a maximum rate of pay for every job, even for exceptional performers. While recognizing and rewarding outstanding performance is vital, a maximum pay range is necessary for several reasons. It helps manage the company’s budget and control labor costs. Without a maximum, salaries could escalate significantly, especially for highly valued employees. It also provides a clear and transparent framework for compensation decisions. Employees know the potential earning range for their position, promoting fairness and reducing ambiguity. Furthermore, it encourages career growth. If an employee has reached the maximum of their pay grade and seeks further financial advancement, it signals that they should consider taking on new responsibilities and/or a higher-level position. This promotes movement and development within the organization. However, the pay range should be regularly reviewed to ensure it remains competitive in the market.”

3. How can an employee at the top of their pay range obtain a salary increase?

“Rebecca, you’ve been a tremendous asset to Front Appliances, and your dedication is truly appreciated. While you’re currently at the top of your pay range, there are several avenues you can explore for a salary increase. These are applicable to any employee in this situation, and I would encourage everyone to consider them.

  • Promotion: The most common way to increase salary is through promotion to a higher-level position with greater responsibilities. You could discuss career progression with your manager and identify potential opportunities for advancement within the company. Perhaps there are additional administrative tasks or team leadership roles you could take on.
  • Reclassification: If the job responsibilities have significantly changed since the last job evaluation, the position may warrant reclassification to a higher pay grade. This requires a formal review of the job description and a thorough evaluation by the job evaluation committee. For example, if you have taken on additional responsibilities related to training new receptionists or managing office supplies, this could justify a reclassification.
  • Merit-Based Bonus: Even at the top of the pay range, exceptional performance can be recognized through one-time bonuses or other forms of merit-based pay. These bonuses are not added to the base salary but are a way to reward outstanding contributions. We could explore implementing a formal bonus program to recognize and reward employees like you.
  • Skill-Based Pay: If you acquire new skills relevant to your role or the company’s needs, you could potentially negotiate a salary increase based on these newly acquired competencies. Perhaps you could take a course in office management or learn a new software system that would benefit the company.
  • Market Adjustment: If the market rate for similar positions has increased significantly, the company may adjust pay ranges to remain competitive. This is something we regularly review.

I encourage you to discuss these options with your manager and explore which path best aligns with your career goals and the company’s needs. We value your contributions, Rebecca, and want to ensure you are fairly compensated for your hard work.”

This question has been answered.

Get Answer