Barry hired Anglin to produce engineering drawings for work Barry was doing at a brewery. Anglin said it would charge "street" rates for the work, which meant $35 an hour for regular work, $40 an hour for overtime work, and $45 an hour for its time. Barry gave Anglin a "purchase order' for the work, but no rate was specified. Barry paid bills for two months. Barry insisted that the work is done, but constantly complained about the rates and did not pay bills for four months. Anglin sued for $98,618, the amount it was due for work at the "street" rate. Barry claimed there was no contract because there was no meeting of the minds about the rate to be paid. Who prevails and why? *Feel free to personalize your view
Sample Solution