Learning and working in teams

1. To watch the video on "Leading and working in Teams" by Professor Amy Edmondson below.
2. Write a 500 words summary on major points that Professor is making about "Leading and working in Teams" and how you will apply those learnings to your team work, Assessment 2.
3. Submit your written summary by Week 4 (March 29, 11.59 pm) using the link provided in the assessment area.
4. At the end of the summary, provide the reference to the video using Swinburne Harvard Style, No need to provide in-text citations or additional references.
5. Please use the marking rubric as a guide
   Please note that you need to watch all the sections of the video. Once the welcome video is finished, press "watch this course button" to go to the main menu, then you can select the next video that you want to watch from the left hand menu (e.g., the difference between teams and teaming, the roles of big L and little leaders, setting compelling goals).
   Alternatively, This video course is ALSO available for free via lynda.com database (Follow these instructions : go to : Swinburne Library, search, click on A-Z data base link and type lynda.com on the search bar and search for the video).
   No need to pay to watch the video
   If you have any question, please post them on the discussion board.

Watch the video available in Week 2 Online Task and submit your 500 word summary here. In the summary, you can follow your own structure to cover the assessment task, you can be creative. Please don't forget to look at the marking rubric at the planning stage of your assessment.
If you are unsure, I can suggest following structures.
Structure 1
• Paragraph 1
o Important point no 1 (from the video)
o How you can use that strategy in your assessment team
o What are the potential benefits/How the assessment team can benefit
• Paragraph 2
o Important point no 2 (from the video)
o How you can use that strategy in your assessment team
o What are the potential benefits/How the assessment team can benefit
• Paragraph 3….. and next etc.
Structure 2
You can discuss all the important points from the video in separate paragraphs and then in a single paragraph collectively summarise how you intend to use those strategies and potential benefits they will bring to your Assessment team.

Video Summary - Based on the Online task from week 2
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome examination and understating of materials - The response needs to demonstrate an excellent understanding of the content shared in the video. 2.0 Pts
Excellent
Excellent understanding of the content shared in the video. At least 4 points are discussed clearly. 1.5 Pts
Very Good
Very good understanding of the content shared in the video. Three points are discussed clearly. 1.0 Pts
Good
Satisfactory understanding of the content shared in the video. Two points are discussed clearly. 0.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Some understanding of the content shared in the video. One point is discussed. 0.0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
The response has little to do with the content of the video.
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeApplication - Effective and realistic recommendations/strategies, clear and logical link to own group work. 2.0 Pts
Excellent
Excellent recommendations/strategies are drawn from the video to improve own group work. 1.5 Pts
Very Good
Very good recommendations/strategies are drawn from the video to improve own group work. 1.0 Pts
Good
Recommendations/strategies are of a good standard. 0.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Recommendations/strategies are attempted, and generally acceptable. 0.0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Recommendations are missing, weak or incomplete.
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome written expression
Quality of written 0.5 Pts
Excellent
Outstanding written expression, the response is coherent and smooth. 0.4 Pts
Good
Written expression is generally good, mostly free from a typographical error. 0.3 Pts
Satisfactory
The written expression can be improved. 0.25 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Written expression is weak 0.0 Pts
Very Good
Very difficult to read. Substantially under the word count.
0.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome academic Referencing
Used Swinburne Harvard style to reference the video 0.5 Pts
Excellent
Excellent referencing skills, no errors 0.4 Pts
Very Good Referencing
Very good referencing skills, 1-2 errors identified. 0.3 Pts
Good Referencing
Good referencing skills, 3 errors identified. 0.25 Pts
Satisfactory Attempt in referencing
More than three errors identified but attempted to reference. 0.0 Pts
Referencing not provided.
Not referenced.
0.5 pts
Total points: 5
Video Summary - Based on the Online task from week 2

Sample Solution