Living a single parenthood

Case#
55yrs old single parent to a 26yrs old daughter married with one child, lives in a rural area, previously works as a house maid for financial needs and supported by the government pension for financial status. Diagnosed endometrial carcinoma FIGO 3 stage IV B colon with subphrenic abscess of CT. (irregular periods, with heavy bleeding for 6months, found out with polyps and it was removed, then biopsy )had TABSO a year ago , presently with colostomy and right side drainage for abscess collection. She’s on her 4th course of her chemotherapy
Medication;

1. Pipenacillin Tazobactam IV 2.25gms every 6hrs for 10 days
2. Ertapenem 1gm OD 14 days
3. Enoxaparin 0.4cc SQ OD
   C/o subphrenic abscess
4. Description of nursing theory/model Levine’s Theory of Conservation
   a. The main concepts and propositions of the theory or model
   b. Application of this nursing theory/model in taking the nursing history and performing the physical assessment of the patient
   c. Application of this nursing theory/model in developing plan of care
   Theory or model as framework of care (15%)
5. Well-explained rationale for choosing the theory 3% or model
6. Comprehensive description of nursing theory or 3% model
7. Clear application to nursing assessment of client 4%
8. Clear application to plan of care 5%
9. ONE full Journal article review (include a brief summary of article and critique in relation to the case)
   You must conduct a critique of a research article guided by the following questions:
10. Are the aims and objectives of the study clearly stated?
11. Are the hypotheses and research questions clearly specified?
12. Are the dependent and independent variables clearly stated?
13. Have the variables been adequately operationalized?
14. Is the design of the study adequately described?
15. Are the research methods appropriate?
16. Were the instruments used appropriate and adequately tested for reliability and validity?
17. Is there an adequate description of the source of the sample, inclusion and exclusion criteria, response rates and sample attrition?
18. Was the statistical power of the study to detect or reject differences (types I and II error) discussed critically?
19. Are ethical considerations presented?
20. Was the study piloted? 12. Were the statistical analyses appropriate and adequate?
21. Are the results clear and adequately reported?
22. Does the discussion of the results report them in the light of the hypotheses of the study and other relevant literature?
23. Are the limitations of the research and its design presented?
24. Does the discussion generalize and draw conclusions beyond the limits of the data and number and type of people studied?
25. Can the findings be generalized to other relevant populations and time periods?
26. Are the implications—practical or theoretical—of the research discussed?
27. Who was the sponsor of the study, and was there a conflict of interest?
28. Are the research data held on an accessible database, or are they otherwise available for scrutiny and re-analysis?
    Comprehensive critique of the research article 35%
    Provides summary of strengths and weakness 35% of the research article
    Conclusion on overall quality of research article 30%

Sample Solution